Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Apr 8:9:809091.
doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.809091. eCollection 2022.

Progress in Applicability of Scoring Systems Based on Nutritional and Inflammatory Parameters for Ovarian Cancer

Affiliations
Review

Progress in Applicability of Scoring Systems Based on Nutritional and Inflammatory Parameters for Ovarian Cancer

Juan Mu et al. Front Nutr. .

Abstract

Ovarian cancer is a malignancy that seriously endangers women's health; its case fatality rate ranks first among the gynecological malignancies. The status of nutrition of ovarian cancer patients is related to their prognoses. Thus, it is important to evaluate, monitor, and improve the nutritional status of ovarian cancer patients during their treatment. Currently, there are several tools for examining malnutrition and nutritional assessment, including NRI (nutrition risk index), PG-SGA (patient-generated subjective global assessment), and NRS 2002 (nutritional risk screening 2002). In addition to malnutrition risk examination and related assessment tools, the evaluation of muscle mass, C-reactive protein, lymphocytes, and other inflammation status indicators, such as neutrophils to lymphocytes ratio, lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio, and C-reactive protein-albumin ratio, is of great importance. The nutritional status of ovarian cancer patients undergoing surgery affects their postoperative complications and survival rates. Accurate evaluation of perioperative nutrition in ovarian cancer patients is crucial in clinical settings. An intelligent nutritional diagnosis can be developed based on the results of its systematic and comprehensive assessment, which would lay a foundation for the implementation of personalized and precise nutritional therapy.

Keywords: efficacy evaluation; inflammatory parameters; nutritional screening; nutritional support; ovarian cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

    1. Xie W, Sun H, Li X, Lin F, Wang Z, Wang X. Ovarian cancer: epigenetics, drug resistance, and progression. Cancer Cell Int. (2021) 21:434. 10.1186/s12935-021-02136-y - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wu Y, Mu J, Cao J, Li D, Dai Y. Research status and progress of nutritional support therapy for ovarian cancer. Nutr Cancer. (2021). [Epub ahead of print]. 10.1080/01635581.2021.1957132 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rinninella E, Fagotti A, Cintoni M, Raoul P, Scaletta G, Quagliozzi L, et al. Nutritional interventions to improve clinical outcomes in ovarian cancer: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Nutrients. (2019) 11:1404. 10.3390/nu11061404 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wattenberg MM, Beatty GL. Overcoming immunotherapeutic resistance by targeting the cancer inflammation cycle. Semin Cancer Biol. (2020) 65:38–50. 10.1016/j.semcancer.2020.01.002 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hu C, Zhang Q, Shi H. Nutrition status of patients with common cancer in China: gap, mission and challenge. Sci China Life Sci. (2021) 64:1980–3. 10.1007/s11427-021-1954-4 - DOI - PubMed