Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr 9:15:100425.
doi: 10.1016/j.abrep.2022.100425. eCollection 2022 Jun.

Cognitions mediate the influence of personality on adolescent cannabis use initiation

Affiliations

Cognitions mediate the influence of personality on adolescent cannabis use initiation

Maya A Pilin et al. Addict Behav Rep. .

Abstract

Aims: Much research indicates that an individual's personality impacts the initiation and escalation of substance use and problems in youth. The acquired-preparedness model suggests that personality influences substance use by modifying learning about substances, which then affects substance use. The current study used longitudinal data to test whether automatic cannabis-related cognitions (memory associations and outcome expectancy liking) mediate the relationship between four personality traits with later cannabis use.

Methods: The study focused on initiation of use in a sample of adolescents who had not previously used (n = 670).

Results: A structural equation model supported a full mediation effect and the hypothesis that personality affects cannabis use in youth by influencing automatic memory associations and outcome expectancy liking. Further findings from the same model also indicated a mediation effect of these cognitions in the relationship between age and cannabis use.

Conclusion: The findings of the study support the acquired-preparedness model where personality influences automatic associations in the context of dual-processing theories of substance use.

Keywords: Adolescents; Cannabis; Cognition; Personality, dual processing; Substance use.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Trimmed Model 1 (without Cognitions at T2).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Trimmed Model 2 (with Cognitions at T2).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ames S.L., Grenard J.L., Thush C., Sussman S., Wiers R.W., Stacy A.W. Comparison of Indirect Assessments of Association as Predictors of Marijuana Use Among At-Risk Adolescents. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology. 2007;15(2):204–218. doi: 10.1037/1064-1297.15.2.218. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ames S.L., Krank M., Grenard J.L., Sussman S., Stacy A.W. Prevention Education Effects on Fundamental Memory Processes. Evaluation & the Health Professions. 2012;35(4):416–439. doi: 10.1177/0163278712444287. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anderson K.G., Smith G.T., Fischer S.F. Women and acquired preparedness: Personality and learning implications for alcohol use. Journal of Studies on Alcohol. 2003;64(3):384–392. doi: 10.15288/jsa.2003.64.384. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Anthenien A.M., Lembo J., Neighbors C. Drinking motives and alcohol outcome expectancies as mediators of the association between negative urgency and alcohol consumption. Addictive Behaviors. 2017;66:101–107. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.11.009. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bolles J.R., Earleywine M., Gordis E. Acquired preparedness model and impulsivity moderated expectancies: Examining predictors of marijuana use. Addiction Research & Theory. 2014;22(6):490–497. doi: 10.3109/16066359.2014.892929. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources