Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar 10;14(3):e23039.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.23039. eCollection 2022 Mar.

Software Analysis of Colonoscopy Videos Enhances Teaching and Quality Metrics

Affiliations

Software Analysis of Colonoscopy Videos Enhances Teaching and Quality Metrics

Vasant Rajan et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

Purpose Machine learning algorithms were hypothesized as being able to predict the quality of colonoscopy luminal images. This is to enhance training and quality indicators in endoscopy. Methods A separate study involving a randomized controlled trial of capped vs. un-capped colonoscopies provided the colonoscopy videos for this study. Videos were analyzed with an algorithm devised by the Australian Institute for Machine Learning. The image analysis validated focus measure, steerable filters-based metrics (SFIL), was used to assess luminal visualization quality and was compared with two independent clinician assessments (C1 and C2). Goodman and Kruskal's gamma (G) measure was used to assess rank correlation data using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 25.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). Results A total of 500 random colonoscopy video clips were extracted and analyzed, 88 being excluded. SFIL scores matched with C1 in 45% and C2 in 42% of cases, respectively. There was a significant correlation between SFIL and C1 (G = 0.644, p < 0.005) and SFIL and C2 (G = 0.734, p < 0.005). Conclusion This study demonstrates that machine learning algorithms can recognize the quality of luminal visualization during colonoscopy. We intend to apply this in the future to enhance colonoscopy training and as a metric for quality assessment.

Keywords: australia; cohort studies; colonoscopy; pilot project; software.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Examples representative of image quality noted during colonoscopy curated by experienced endoscopists.
Figure 2
Figure 2. SFIL scoring of image sets, aligning with clinical classification.
SFIL, steerable filters-based metrics.

Similar articles

References

    1. Institute of Medicine. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2000. To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System. - PubMed
    1. Colonoscopy quality: metrics and implementation. Calderwood AH, Jacobson BC. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2013;42:599–618. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Healthcare. Colonoscopy Clinical Care Standard (revised 2020) [ Jan; 2022 ];https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/publications-and-resources/resource-... Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Healthcare. 2020
    1. Methodology to develop machine learning algorithms to improve performance in gastrointestinal endoscopy. de Lange T, Halvorsen P, Riegler M. World J Gastroenterol. 2018;24:5057–5062. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Endocuff Vision-assisted colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial. Jacob A, Schafer A, Yong J, et al. ANZ J Surg. 2019;89:0–8. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources