Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr 7:13:869352.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.869352. eCollection 2022.

Identifying Determinants of Dyslexia: An Ultimate Attempt Using Machine Learning

Affiliations

Identifying Determinants of Dyslexia: An Ultimate Attempt Using Machine Learning

Sietske Walda et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Research based on traditional linear techniques has yet not been able to clearly identify the role of cognitive skills in reading problems, presumably because the process of reading and the factors that are associated with reading reside within a system of multiple interacting and moderating factors that cannot be captured within traditional statistical models. If cognitive skills are indeed indicative of reading problems, the relatively new nonlinear techniques of machine learning should make better predictions. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether cognitive factors play any role in reading skill, questioning (1) the extent to what cognitive skills are indicative of present reading level, and (2) the extent to what cognitive skills are indicative of future reading progress. In three studies with varying groups of participants (average school-aged and poor readers), the results of four supervised machine learning techniques were compared to the traditional General Linear Models technique. Results of all models appeared to be comparable, producing poor to acceptable results, which are however inadequate for making a thorough prediction of reading development. Assumably, cognitive skills are not predictive of reading problems, although they do correlate with one another. This insight has consequences for scientific theories of reading development, as well as for the prevention and remediation of reading difficulties.

Keywords: cognitive skills; dyslexia; machine learning; reading development; word decoding and reading outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Schematic overview of conducted studies and aims, research questions, and model building techniques that were involved. RQ, research question.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
ROC-curves for the predictive ability of the models in all three studies built with five machine learning techniques.

References

    1. Al Otaiba S., Fuchs D. (2006). Who are the young children for whom best practices in reading are ineffective? J. Learn. Disabil. 39 414–431. 10.1177/00222194060390050401 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Araújo S., Faísca L. (2019). A meta-analytic review of naming-speed deficits in developmental dyslexia. Sci. Stud. Read. 23 349–368. 10.1080/10888438.2019.1572758 - DOI
    1. Astle D. E., Bathelt J. The Calm Team Holmes J. (2018). Remapping the cognitive and neural profiles of children who struggle at school. Dev. Sci. 22:e12747. 10.1111/desc.12747 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Blomert L. (2006). Protocol Dyslexie Diagnostiek en Behandeling [Protocol Dyslexia Diagnostics and Remediation]. Available online at: https://docplayer.nl/19724769-Protocol-dyslexie-diagnostiek-en-behandeli... (accessed March, 21, 2022).
    1. Braams T., Bosman A. M. T. (2000). Fonologische vaardigheden, geletterdheid en lees- en spellinginstructie [Phonological skills, literacy, and reading and spelling instruction]. Tijdschr. Orthopedagogiek 39 199–211. 10.47635/kjld.2019.16.1.199 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources