Effectiveness of Cognitive Orientation to Occupational Performance intervention in improving motor skills of children with developmental coordination disorder: A randomized waitlist-control trial
- PMID: 35466705
- PMCID: PMC9082975
- DOI: 10.1177/02692155221086188
Effectiveness of Cognitive Orientation to Occupational Performance intervention in improving motor skills of children with developmental coordination disorder: A randomized waitlist-control trial
Abstract
Objectives: To determine if Cognitive Orientation to Occupational Performance was effective in improving performance and transfer of motor learning in children with developmental coordination disorder (with/without attention deficit hyperactivity disorder); and whether outcomes were maintained three months post-intervention.
Design: Randomized waitlist-control trial (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02597751).
Setting: BC Children's Hospital, Vancouver, Canada.
Subjects: Thirty-seven children with developmental coordination disorder and 41 children with co-occurring attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (all 8-12 years), randomized to treatment or waitlist groups.
Interventions: One-hour of intervention once weekly for 10 weeks.
Main measures: (1) Canadian Occupational Performance Measure to measure self-perceived performance of motor goals (10-point scale); (2) Performance Quality Rating Scale to measure therapist-observed movement quality (10-point scale); and (3) Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency - 2nd ed. to measure overall motor skill ability/transfer of motor learning (percentile).
Results: Both groups showed significant improvement (p < 0.001) in motor performance (developmental coordination disorder: pre: 2.7 ± 2.2, post: 7.0 ± 1.0; developmental coordination disorder with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: pre: 2.3 ± 1.7, post: 7.0 ± 1.5) and movement quality (developmental coordination disorder: pre: 3.0 ± 1.5, post: 6.3 ± 1.7; developmental coordination disorder with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: pre: 3.0 ± 1.9, post: 5.7 ± 2.3). Three months after treatment, children maintained their gains, but only children with developmental coordination disorder showed transfer of learning to overall motor skills (pre:12 ± 15, post:12 ± 12, follow-up:14 ± 20, p < 0.001).
Conclusion: Intervention was similarly effective for children with developmental coordination disorder with/without attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in achieving and maintaining functional motor goals, but only children with developmental coordination disorder showed transfer of learning to other motor skills.
Keywords: Randomized controlled trial; developmental coordination disorder; motor skills disorder; occupational therapy; paediatric rehabilitation.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures




References
-
- Zwicker JG, Missiuna C, Harris SR, et al. Developmental coordination disorder: a review and update. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 2012; 16: 573–581. - PubMed
-
- American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing, 2013.
-
- Kirby A, Sugden D, Purcell C. Diagnosing developmental coordination disorders. Arch Dis Child 2014; 99: 292–296. - PubMed
-
- Piek JP, Pitcher TM, Hay DA. Motor coordination and kinaesthesis in boys with attention deficit–hyperactivity disorder. Dev Med Child Neurol 1999; 41: 159–165. - PubMed
-
- Rasmussen P, Gillberg C. Natural outcome of ADHD with developmental coordination disorder at age 22 years: a controlled, longitudinal, community-based study. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2000; 39: 1424–1431. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical