A scoping review of youth advisory structures in the United States: Applications, outcomes, and best practices
- PMID: 35467024
- DOI: 10.1002/ajcp.12597
A scoping review of youth advisory structures in the United States: Applications, outcomes, and best practices
Abstract
Although youth advisory structures (YASs) have proliferated internationally to facilitate the voice of young people, little is known about the practices of such groups, especially in the United States. To address this gap of knowledge, this study describes the findings of a scoping review of scholarly research on YAS in the United States. The review found that although the use of YAS is increasing, current scholarship offers little information about YAS processes or how youth are engaged. Most YAS in the review partnered with marginalized young people to inform research and programming around sensitive health topics, such as human immunodeficiency virus prevention. Youth who participated in YAS experienced positive outcomes such as leadership and skill development, healthier decision-making, and confidence. Although most studies involved youth in minimal ways, there is a growing body of literature where youth are engaged in long-term partnerships that support positive youth development. This review details other key characteristics of YAS and provides recommendations for best practices, such as building consensus around terms used to refer to YAS and promoting the dissemination of process details around YAS facilitation.
Keywords: positive youth development; youth advisors; youth advisory structures; youth councils; youth leadership; youth partners.
© 2022 Society for Community Research and Action.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Akiva, T., Cortina, K. S., & Smith, C. (2014). Involving youth in program decision making: How common and what might it do for youth? Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43(11), 1844-1860.
-
- Anyon, Y., Bender, K., Kennedy, H., & Dechants, J. (2018). A systematic review of youth participatory action research (YPAR) in the United States: Methodologies, youth outcomes, and future directions. Health Education and Behavior, 45(6), 865-878.
-
- Arbeit, M. R., Fisher, C. B., Macapagal, K., & Mustanski, B. (2016). Bisexual invisibility and the sexual health needs of adolescent girls. LGBT Health, 3(5), 342-349. https://doi.org/10.1089/lgbt.2016.0035
-
- Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of American Institute of Planners, 35, 216-224.
-
- Arunkumar, K., Bowman, D., Coen, S., El-Bagdady, M., Ergler, C., Gilliland, J., & Paul, S. (2019). Conceptualizing youth participation in children's health research: Insights from a youth-driven process for developing a youth advisory council. Children, 6(1), 3.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous