Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May;27(3):e13142.
doi: 10.1111/adb.13142.

Central nervous system monoamine metabolite response to alcohol exposure is associated with future alcohol intake in a nonhuman primate model (Macaca mulatta)

Affiliations

Central nervous system monoamine metabolite response to alcohol exposure is associated with future alcohol intake in a nonhuman primate model (Macaca mulatta)

Elizabeth K Wood et al. Addict Biol. 2022 May.

Abstract

It is widely held that the central monoamine neurotransmitters modulate alcohol intake. Few studies, however, directly assess the relationship between baseline and alcohol-induced monoamine turnover, as well as the change from baseline, as predictors of alcohol intake. Using a nonhuman primate model, this study investigates baseline, alcohol-induced and alcohol-induced change in monoamine activity and their relationship with alcohol intake. Alcohol-naïve, adolescent rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta, N = 114) were administered a standardized intravenous bolus of alcohol solution (16.8%, v/v) on two occasions, approximately 1 month apart. One month prior to and 1 h following each alcohol infusion, cisternal cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) was obtained and assayed for monoamine metabolite concentrations. Approximately 6-7 months later, subjects were allowed unfettered access to an aspartame-sweetened alcohol solution (8.4%, v/v) for 1 h/day, 5 days/week, over 5-7 weeks. Results showed strong positive correlations between baseline and post-infusion CSF monoamine metabolite concentrations, indicating a trait-like response. Low baseline and post-infusion serotonin and dopamine metabolite concentrations and a smaller change in serotonin and dopamine metabolites from one infusion to the next were associated with higher alcohol intake. Low baseline and post-infusion norepinephrine metabolite concentrations predicted high alcohol intake, but unlike the other monoamines, a greater change in norepinephrine metabolite concentrations from one infusion to the next was associated with higher alcohol intake. These findings suggest that individual differences in naturally occurring and alcohol-induced monoamine activity, as well as the change between exposures, are important modulators of initial alcohol consumption and may play a role in the risk for excessive alcohol intake.

Keywords: alcohol; dopamine; monoamines; norepinephrine; rhesus monkeys; serotonin.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

No conflicts of interest to report.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) monoamine metabolite concentrations at Baseline, Time 1 and Time 2. Results from repeated measures analyses of variance (ANOVAs) showed statistically significant concentration increases in each of the monoamine metabolites following each of the alcohol infusions (CSF 5-hydroxyindolecetic acid [5-HIAA]: F[1,113] = 68.56, p < 0.0001; CSF 3-methoxy-4-hydroxyphenylglycol [MHPG]: F[1,113] = 169.65, p < 0.0001); CSF homovanillic acid [HVA]: F[1,113] = 88.81, p < 0.0001). Bars indicate standard error bars
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Relationship of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) 5-hydroxyindolecetic acid (5-HIAA) concentrations and oral alcohol intake. Controlling for rearing, results from regressions showed statistically significant negative relationships between Baseline CSF 5-HIAA concentrations (β = −0.24, p = 0.02) and T1 CSF 5-HIAA concentrations (β = −0.20, p = 0.04) and later voluntary alcohol intake. Results also showed that there were negative relationships between the change in CSF 5-HIAA concentrations from Baseline to T1 (β = −0.22, p = 0.04) and from Baseline to T2 (β = −0.29, p = 0.003) and subsequent alcohol intake. The relationship between the change from T1 to T2 and subsequent alcohol intake was also significant (β = −0.36, p = 0.005). The relationship between T2 CSF 5-HIAA concentrations and alcohol intake failed to achieve traditional statistical significance (β = 0.17, p = 0.07)
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Relationship of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) 3-methoxy-4-hydroxyphenylglycol (MHPG) concentrations and oral alcohol intake. Controlling for rearing, results from the regressions showed statistically significant negative relationships between T1 CSF MHPG concentrations (β = −0.33, p = 0.01) and T2 CSF MHPG concentrations (β = −0.32, p = 0.001) and later voluntary alcohol intake. Results also showed that there were positive relationships between the change in CSF MHPG concentrations from Baseline to T1 (β = 0.33, p = 0.001) and from Baseline to T2 (β = 0.32, p = 0.002) and subsequent alcohol intake. The relationship between the change from T1 to T2 and subsequent alcohol intake was also significant (β = −0.20, p = 0.03). The relationship between Baseline CSF MHPG concentrations and alcohol intake was not statistically significant (β = −0.13, p = 0.21)
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Relationship of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) homovanillic acid (HVA) concentrations and oral alcohol intake. Controlling for rearing, results from regressions showed statistically significant negative relationships between Baseline CSF HVA concentrations (β = −0.35, p < 0.0001), as well as T1 CSF HVA concentrations (β = −0.24, p = 0.01) and later voluntary alcohol intake. Results also showed negative relationships between the change in CSF HVA concentrations from Baseline to T1 (β = −0.22, p = 0.03) and from Baseline to T2 (β = −0.40, p < 0.001) and subsequent alcohol intake. The relationship between the change from T1 to T2 and subsequent alcohol intake was also significant (β = −0.33, p < 0.001). The relationship between T2 CSF HVA concentrations and alcohol intake was not statistically significant (β = 0.14, p = 0.17)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Alcoholism NIoAAa. Major initiatives. Published 2021. Accessed May 30, 2021.
    1. Cloninger. Neurogenetic adaptive mechanisms in alcoholism. Science. 1987;236(4800):410–416. - PubMed
    1. Cloninger CR, Sigvardsson S, Bohman M. Type I and type II alcoholism: an update. Alcohol Res Health. 1996;20(1):18–23. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Virkkunen M, Linnoila M. Brain serotonin, type II alcoholism and impulsive violence. J Stud Alcohol Suppl. 1993;11(11):163–169. - PubMed
    1. Heinz A, Ragan P, Jones DW, et al. Reduced central serotonin transporters in alcoholism. Psychiatry. 1998;155(11):1544–1549. - PubMed

Publication types