Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Sep;25(9):2625-2636.
doi: 10.1017/S1368980022000969. Epub 2022 Apr 26.

Nutrition programmes for individuals living with disadvantage in supported residential settings: a scoping review

Affiliations

Nutrition programmes for individuals living with disadvantage in supported residential settings: a scoping review

Verena T Vaiciurgis et al. Public Health Nutr. 2022 Sep.

Abstract

Objective: Health inequities such as chronic disease are significantly higher among individuals living with disadvantage compared with the general population and many are reported to be attributable to preventable dietary risk factors. This study provides an overview of the current nutrition interventions for individuals living with extreme disadvantage, in supported residential settings, to develop insights into the development and implementation of policies and practices to promote long-term nutritional health and well-being.

Design: A scoping review searched Scopus, ProQuest, CINAHL Plus, MEDLINE, and Web of Science databases using the terms 'resident', 'nutrition', 'disadvantage', 'intervention' and their synonyms, with particular emphasis on interventions in residential settings.

Setting: Residential services providing nutrition provision and support.

Participants: People experiencing extreme disadvantage.

Results: From 5262 articles, seven were included in final synthesis. Most interventions focused on building food literacy knowledge and skills. Study designs and outcome measures varied; however, all reported descriptive improvements in behaviour and motivation. In addition to food literacy, it was suggested that interventions need to address behaviour and motivations, programme sustainability, long-term social, physical and economic barriers and provide support for participants during transition into independent living. Socio-economic issues remain key barriers to long-term health and well-being.

Conclusions: In addition to food literacy education, future research and interventions should consider utilising an academic-community partnership, addressing nutrition-related mental health challenges, motivation and behaviour change and a phased approach to improve support for individuals transitioning into independent living.

Keywords: Disadvantage; Homeless shelter; Intervention; Nutrition education.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses extension for scoping review (PRISMA-ScR) of included articles relating to nutrition interventions in residential care for individuals living with disadvantage

References

    1. Afshin A, Sur PJ, Ferrara G et al. (2019) Health effects of dietary risks in 195 countries, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2017. Lancet 393, 1958–1972. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baciu A, Negussie Y, Geller A et al. (2017) Communities in Action: Pathways to Health Equity. Washington, DC: National Academies Press (US). - PubMed
    1. Lewis VA, Larson BK, McClurg AB et al. (2012) The promise and peril of accountable care for vulnerable populations: a framework for overcoming obstacles. Health Aff 31, 1777–1785. - PubMed
    1. Chamberlain C & MacKenzie D (2014) Definition and counting: where to now. In Homelessness in Australia: An Introduction, pp. 71–99 [Chamberlain C, Johnson G and Robinson C, editors]. Australia: NewSouth Publishing.
    1. Devine A & Lawlis T (2019) Nutrition and vulnerable groups. Nutrients 11, 1066. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types