Antibiotic prescribing patterns and guideline-concordant management of acute respiratory tract infections in virtual urgent care settings

Abstract

Background: Antibiotic overprescribing for acute respiratory tract infections (ARTIs) commonly occurs and can lead to higher medical costs, antibiotic resistance, and health complications. Inappropriate prescribing of antibiotics for ARTIs has been shown to occur more frequently in urgent care than other outpatient settings. It is not clear whether antibiotic overprescribing varies between virtual and in-person urgent care.

Objectives: Summarize published primary scientific literature on antibiotic prescribing patterns for ARTIs among adults in virtual urgent care settings.

Data sources: We conducted a systematic review to compare antibiotic prescribing for ARTIs between virtual and in-person urgent care. Our review was guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist. We assessed risk of bias using the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies-of Interventions (ROBINS-I) assessment tool. We summarized study results from seven included retrospective cohort studies.

Conclusions: Antibiotic prescribing frequency may be similar between virtual urgent care and in-person care for adult patients treated for ARTIs. However, variability existed in intervention characteristics, settings, and outcome measures. Additional studies are needed to better understand the conditions in which virtual care may be most effective.

Implications for practice: Evidence suggests that giving providers direct access to evidence-based guidelines and electronic health records within the virtual visit may support diagnosis and management. Furthermore, practices that use telemedicine platforms for virtual urgent care visits should consider how to potentially improve diagnosis and management of conditions through the use of home-based point-of-care testing or accessory "e-tools."