Editorial: risk of hepatocellular carcinoma with tenofovir vs entecavir-a "knock-out" is yet to be delivered
- PMID: 35472182
- DOI: 10.1111/apt.16822
Editorial: risk of hepatocellular carcinoma with tenofovir vs entecavir-a "knock-out" is yet to be delivered
Comment in
-
Editorial: risk of hepatocellular carcinoma with tenofovir vs entecavir-A "knock-out" is yet to be delivered-Authors' reply.Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2022 May;55(10):1344-1345. doi: 10.1111/apt.16920. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2022. PMID: 35472178 No abstract available.
Comment on
-
Tenofovir Versus Entecavir for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Prevention in an International Consortium of Chronic Hepatitis B.Am J Gastroenterol. 2020 Feb;115(2):271-280. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000428. Am J Gastroenterol. 2020. PMID: 31634265
References
REFERENCES
-
- Terrault NA, Lok ASF, McMahon BJ, et al. Update on prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of chronic hepatitis B: AASLD 2018 hepatitis B guidance. Clin Liver Dis (Hoboken). 2018;12:33-34.
-
- EASL. 2017 clinical practice guidelines on the management of hepatitis B virus infection. J Hepatol. 2017;67:370-398.
-
- Sarin SK, Kumar M, Lau GK, et al. Asian-Pacific clinical practice guidelines on the management of hepatitis B: a 2015 update. Hepatol Int. 2016;10:1-98.
-
- Choi J, Kim HJ, Lee J, Cho S, Ko MJ, Lim YS. Risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients treated with entecavir vs tenofovir for chronic hepatitis B: a Korean Nationwide cohort study. JAMA Oncol. 2019;5:30-36.
-
- Kim SU, Seo YS, Lee HA, et al. A multicenter study of entecavir vs. tenofovir on prognosis of treatment-naïve chronic hepatitis B in South Korea. J Hepatol. 2019;71:456-464.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Medical