Measures of self-regulation used in adult rehabilitation populations: A systematic review and content screening
- PMID: 35473388
- PMCID: PMC9284405
- DOI: 10.1177/02692155221091510
Measures of self-regulation used in adult rehabilitation populations: A systematic review and content screening
Abstract
Objective: We aimed to identify generic measures of self-regulation and to examine the degree to which these measures fit a recently developed conceptual model of self-regulation in a rehabilitation context.
Data sources: Pubmed, Embase, PsycInfo, and CINAHL were searched.
Review methods: Articles were included if they were published between January 2015 and August 2020 and reported on empirical studies (trials and observational studies) using a measure of self-regulation or a related concept, in an adult rehabilitation population. Main content was analysed by linking all items of the selected measures to one or more of the six sub-themes of self-regulation: (1) insight into physical and cognitive impairments, (2) insight into the consequences of the impairments, (3) insight into abilities, (4) to be able to communicate limitations, (5) trust in body and functioning, and (6) make use of abilities.
Results: Two reviewers independently screened 7808 abstracts, resulting in the inclusion of 236 articles. In these articles, 80 different measures were used to assess self-regulation or related concept. Nineteen of these measures met the inclusion criteria and were included for the content analyses. Nine of these were self-efficacy measures. No measures covered four or more of the six sub-themes of self-regulation. The three sub-themes on gaining insights were covered less compared to the sub-domains 'trust' and 'make use of abilities'.
Conclusions: Many measures on self-regulation exist None of these measures cover all six sub-themes of self-regulation considered important to measure self-regulation as a rehabilitation outcome.
Keywords: Self-regulation; patient reported outcome measures; rehabilitation; systematic review.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
References
-
- McClure J, Leah C. Is independence enough? Rehabilitation should include autonomy and social engagement to achieve quality of life. Clin Rehabil 2021; 35: 3–12. - PubMed
-
- Nedelandse vereniging van revalidatieartsen. Position paper medical rehabilitation. VRA: Utrecht, 2015.
-
- Zimmerman BJ. Attaining self-regulation. In: Handbook of self-regulation. Elsevier Science: 2005, pp. 13–40.
-
- Toering T, Elferink-Gemser MT, Jonker L, et al. Measuring self-regulation in a learning context: reliability and validity of the self- regulation of learning self-report scale (SRL-SRS). Int J Sport Exerc Psychol 2012; 10: 24–38.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
