Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr 26;22(1):558.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07960-0.

Definition and conceptualization of the patient-centered care pathway, a proposed integrative framework for consensus: a Concept analysis and systematic review

Affiliations

Definition and conceptualization of the patient-centered care pathway, a proposed integrative framework for consensus: a Concept analysis and systematic review

Jean-Baptiste Gartner et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: Confusion exists over the definition of the care pathway concept and existing conceptual frameworks contain various inadequacies which have led to implementation difficulties. In the current global context of rapidly changing health care systems, there is great need for a standardized definition and integrative framework that can guide implementation. This study aims to propose an accurate and up-to-date definition of care pathway and an integrative conceptual framework.

Methods: An innovative hybrid method combining systematic review, concept analysis and bibliometric analysis was undertaken to summarize qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-method studies. Databases searched were PubMed, Embase and ABI/Inform. Methodological quality of included studies was then assessed.

Results: Forty-four studies met the inclusion criteria. Using concept analysis, we developed a fine-grained understanding, an integrative conceptual framework, and an up-to-date definition of patient-centered care pathway by proposing 28 subcategories grouped into seven attributes. This conceptual framework considers both operational and social realities and supports the improvement and sustainable transformation of clinical, administrative, and organizational practices for the benefit of patients and caregivers, while considering professional experience, organizational constraints, and social dynamics. The proposed attributes of a fluid and effective pathway are (i) the centricity of patients and caregivers, (ii) the positioning of professional actors involved in the care pathway, (iii) the operation management through the care delivery process, (iv) the particularities of coordination structures, (v) the structural context of the system and organizations, (vi) the role of the information system and data management and (vii) the advent of the learning system. Antecedents are presented as key success factors of pathway implementation. By using the consequences and empirical referents, such as outcomes and evidence of care pathway interventions, we went beyond the single theoretical aim, proposing the application of the conceptual framework to healthcare management.

Conclusions: This study has developed an up-to-date definition of patient-centered care pathway and an integrative conceptual framework. Our framework encompasses 28 subcategories grouped into seven attributes that should be considered in complex care pathway intervention. The formulation of these attributes, antecedents as success factors and consequences as potential outcomes, allows the operationalization of this model for any pathway in any context.

Keywords: Care pathway; Care process; Concept analysis; Healthcare management; Learning health system; Patient journey; Patient-centered; Sustainable transformation; Systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA 2020 flow diagram of the systematic review process
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Frequency of selected publications over time
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Care pathway bibliometric links
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Clinical pathway bibliometric links
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Patient journey bibliometric links
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Care process bibliometric links
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Integrative conceptual framework of care pathway

References

    1. Kelly J, Dwyer J, Mackean T, O’Donnell K, Willis E. Coproducing Aboriginal patient journey mapping tools for improved quality and coordination of care. Aust J Prim Health. 2018;23(6):536–542. doi: 10.1071/PY16069. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bergin RJ, Whitfield K, White V, et al. Optimal care pathways: a national policy to improve quality of cancer care and address inequalities in cancer outcomes. J Cancer Policy. 2020;25:100245. doi: 10.1016/j.jcpo.2020.100245. - DOI
    1. Hutchinson K, Herkes G, Shih P, et al. Identification and referral of patients with refractory epilepsy from the primary to the tertiary care interface in New South Wales, Australia. Epilepsy Behav. 2020;111:107232. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2020.107232. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fung-Kee-Fung M, Maziak D, Pantarotto J, et al. Regional process redesign of lung cancer care: a learning health system pilot project. Curr Oncol. 2018;25(1):59–66. doi: 10.3747/co.25.3719. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alkandari M, Ryan K, Hollywood A. The experiences of people living with peripheral neuropathy in Kuwait-a process map of the patient journey. Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) 2019;7(3):127. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy7030127. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources