Evaluation of a new "all in one" SARS-CoV-2 antigen-detecting rapid diagnostic test and self-test: Diagnostic performance and usability in child and adult populations
- PMID: 35474460
- PMCID: PMC9088384
- DOI: 10.1002/jmv.27812
Evaluation of a new "all in one" SARS-CoV-2 antigen-detecting rapid diagnostic test and self-test: Diagnostic performance and usability in child and adult populations
Abstract
The control of the COVID-19 epidemics has been one global health priorities for the last 2 years. To that end, more reliable and easy-to-use, regardless of age, diagnostic tests are necessary. Considering that, we evaluated an innovative two-step self-test, the AAZ COVID-VIRO ALL IN®, switching from the classic nasal swab to a nasal sponge. We performed a multicenter study, on 124 adults and children, in a point-of-care setting. Sensitivity, specificity and overall acceptance of the COVID-VIRO ALL IN® self-test compared to reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) on nasopharyngeal samples were of 93.0%, 100%, and 97.5%, respectively. We then performed a multicenter, usability study to evaluate the ease of use of COVID-VIRO ALL IN® on 68 laypersons adults. A vast majority of participants correctly executed and interpreted the test. The usability was then specifically investigated on 40 children and teenagers, comparing COVID-VIRO® first generation to the new COVID-VIRO ALL IN®. They all found COVID-VIRO ALL IN® more comfortable and easier to use. For young children, the new self-test seems safer (less risk of trauma and no liquid exposure), and faster than saliva-based RT-PCR. Moreover, the COVID-VIRO ALL IN® can easily be adapted as a multiplex self-test for other respiratory viruses, opening new perspectives of simultaneous, rapid and massive detection of respiratory infections, especially among vulnerable populations like children and elderly people.
Keywords: COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; antigen testing; children COVID testing; diagnostic testing; nasal sampling; self-test; usability.
© 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures
Comment in
-
Evaluating agreement in different diagnosis methods is necessary.J Med Virol. 2023 Jan;95(1):e28117. doi: 10.1002/jmv.28117. Epub 2022 Sep 10. J Med Virol. 2023. PMID: 36056612 No abstract available.
References
-
- World Health Organization . The media briefing on COVID‐19 [Internet]. 2020. Accessed September 10, 2021. https://www.who.int/director-general/speeches/detail/who-director-genera...
-
- World Health Oragnization. WHO Coronavirus . (COVID‐19) Dashboard [Internet]. Accessed December 22, 2021. https://covid19.who.int
-
- French National Academy of Medicine . Covid‐19: Which Samples for Which Tests? [Internet]. 2021. Accessed September 10, 2021. https://www.academie-medecine.fr/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/21.2.17-Covi...
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
