Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr;32(2):138-147.
doi: 10.1002/cbm.2235. Epub 2022 Apr 26.

Mental illness-related stigma among probation officers

Affiliations

Mental illness-related stigma among probation officers

Ashley Givens et al. Crim Behav Ment Health. 2022 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Probation officers tend to hold stigmatising attitudes towards individuals on their caseload with mental illnesses. This can result in poor outcomes for justice-involved people with mental illnesses. Though anti-stigma interventions in the general public and among other criminal-legal professionals hold promise, these interventions have not been tested among probation officers.

Aims: To measure levels of stigma towards mental illnesses among probation officers before and after a brief online training related to mental illness.

Methods: Two hundred and seventy-five probation and parole officers in one Midwest state completed a three-module online training programme designed to increase knowledge and skills for working with clients with mental illnesses. Officers completed a pre- and post-training assessment of level of stigmatising attitudes towards individuals with mental illnesses.

Results: Officer levels of stigma statistically significantly decreased from pre-test (8.22) to post-test (7.37; p < 0.001, t = 6.13). Nevertheless, pre-training stigma scores were the strongest predictor of stigma levels at post-test (p < 0.001, b = 0.90).

Conclusions: While basic training can significantly decrease mental disorder stigmatising scores for probation officers, the practical effect of this brief online experience was very small. Nevertheless, the fact that such brief and generalised input can have impact at all is encouraging. Implementation could be a useful preliminary to improving the quality of probation supervision of clients with mental illnesses.

Keywords: mental illness; probation; stigma; training.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Brown, S. A. (2008). Factors and measurement of mental illness stigma: A psychometric examination of the attribution questionnaire. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 32(2), 89-94.
    1. Canada, K. E., Watson, A. C., & O’Kelley, S. (2020). Utilizing crisis intervention teams (CIT) in prison to improve officer knowledge, stigmatizing attitudes, and perception of response options. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 48, 10-31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854820942274
    1. Compton, M. T., Esterberg, M. L., McGee, R., Kotwicki, R. J., & Oliva, J. R. (2006). Crisis intervention team training: Changes in knowledge, attitudes, and stigma related to schizophrenia. Psychiatric Services, 57(8), 1199-1202.
    1. Corrigan, P. W. (2003). Mental health stigma as social attribution: Implications for research methods and attitude change. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 7(1), 48-67.
    1. Corrigan, P. W., Morris, S. B., Michaels, P. J., Rafacz, J. D., & Rusch, N. (2012). Challenging the public stigma of mental illness: A meta-analysis of outcome studies. Psychiatric Services, 63(10), 963-973.

LinkOut - more resources