Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Jun 9;1(4):122-125.
doi: 10.1002/bco2.20. eCollection 2020 Sep.

Review of the use of prophylactic drain tubes post-robotic radical prostatectomy: Dogma or decent practice?

Tatenda C Nzenza  1   2   3 , Simeon Ngweso  2   4 , Renu Eapen  1   3 , Nieroshan Rajarubendra  1 , Damien Bolton  1   5 , Declan Murphy  3 , Nathan Lawrentschuk  1   3   5   6
Affiliations
Review

Review of the use of prophylactic drain tubes post-robotic radical prostatectomy: Dogma or decent practice?

Tatenda C Nzenza et al. BJUI Compass. .

Abstract

Objective: To assess the necessity of routine prophylactic drain tube use following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).

Method: We performed a literature review using the Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science databases with no restriction of language from January 1900 to January 2020. The following terms we used in the literature search: prostatectomy, radical prostatectomy, robot assisted, drainage, and drain tube.

Results: We identified six studies that examined the use of routine prophylactic drain tubes following RARP. One of these studies was a randomized study that included 189 patients, with 97 in the pelvic drain (PD) arm and 92 in the no pelvic drain (ND) arm. This non-inferiority showed an early (90-day) complication rate of 17.4% in the ND arm versus 26.8% in the PD arm (P < .001). Another non-inferiority randomized control trial (RCT) showed a complication rate of 28.9% in the PD group versus 20.4% in the ND group (P = .254). Similarly, the other studies found no benefit of routine use of prophylactic drain tube after RARP.

Conclusion: Drain tubes play a role during robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy, however, following a review of the current available literature, they can be safely omitted and we suggest that clinicians may be selective in their use.

Keywords: RARP; drain tube; drainage; prostatectomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

References

    1. Robinson JO. Surgical drainage: an historical perspective. Br J Surg. 1986;73:422–6. - PubMed
    1. Bhoir LN, Jagne NY, Murali D. Is using peritoneal drains in bowel surgeries beneficial? Int Surg J. 2017;4(2):650. 10.18203/2349-2902.isj20170208 - DOI
    1. Loh A, Jones PA. Evisceration and other complications of abdominal drains. Postgrad Med J. 1991;67:687–8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Puleo FJ, Mishra N, Hall JF. Use of intra‐abdominal drains. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2013;26:174–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chenam A, Yuh B, Zhumkhawala A, Ruel N, Chu W, Lau C, et al. Prospective randomised non‐inferiority trial of pelvic drain placement vs no pelvic drain placement after robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2018;121:357–64. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources