Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May 3;11(9):e022198.
doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.022198. Epub 2022 Apr 27.

Event Rates and Risk Factors for Recurrent Cardiovascular Events and Mortality in a Contemporary Post Acute Coronary Syndrome Population Representing 239 234 Patients During 2005 to 2018 in the United States

Affiliations

Event Rates and Risk Factors for Recurrent Cardiovascular Events and Mortality in a Contemporary Post Acute Coronary Syndrome Population Representing 239 234 Patients During 2005 to 2018 in the United States

Dylan L Steen et al. J Am Heart Assoc. .

Abstract

Background Patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are recognized by guidelines as remaining at high risk for adverse outcomes. Evidence from contemporary, representative ACS populations in a clinical practice setting is necessary to identify subgroups and strategies for improving patient outcomes. We aimed to describe event rates and risk factors in an ACS population over prolonged follow-up for cardiovascular end points. Methods and Results We identified 239 234 patients in the Optum Research Database (57.2% men; mean [standard deviation] age, 69.2 [12.2] years) with evidence of an ACS hospitalization (index ACS) during January 1, 2005 through December 30, 2018. Subgroups were based on index ACS event (myocardial infarction/unstable angina and revascularization status) and the Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction Risk Score for Secondary Prevention. The 5-year event rate for the primary end point representing nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal ischemic stroke, and cardiovascular death was 33.4% (95% CI, 33.1%-33.7%; P<0.001). The risk of experiencing the primary end point was ≈6-fold higher immediately after discharge (≈40.9% annualized risk) as compared with the period 1+ years after hospitalization (≈6.4% annualized risk). Among subgroups, the 5-year primary end point event rate was highest for myocardial infarction without revascularization and a Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction Risk Score for Secondary Prevention ≥4, at 47.9% (95% CI, 47.3%-48.4%; P<0.001) and 56.7% (95% CI, 55.9%-57.4%; P<0.001), respectively. Conclusions Patients with ACS remain at very high risk of experiencing recurrent cardiovascular events, particularly early after discharge, with identifiable subgroups at multifold higher risk of specific clinical end points.

Keywords: acute coronary syndrome; cardiovascular events; risk factor; risk stratification.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Consort diagram for patient selection.
Patients with an ACS hospitalization during January 1, 2005 to December 30, 2018 were initially selected. Sequential application of the study inclusion and exclusion criteria resulted in a final study population of N=239 234. ACS indicates acute coronary syndrome; and NDI, National Death Index.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Event rates and instantaneous risk over time for the primary and individual end points.
Shown is the cumulative incidence of the primary end point (first occurrence of nonfatal MI, nonfatal ischemic stroke, or CV death) and individual end points (represented by components of the composite). The KM rates for the primary end point at 1, 3, and 5 years were 14.5% (95% CI, 14.3%–14.6%; P<0.001), 25.2% (95% CI, 25.0%–25.5%; P<0.001), and 33.4% (95% CI, 33.1%–33.7%; P<0.001), respectively. The instantaneous risks (annualized) for the primary end point at 0, 1, and 3 years were 40.9%, 6.7%, and 6.4%, respectively. Below the graphs capturing the cumulative incidence of the primary and individual end points are data on the number of patients at risk of experiencing the corresponding end point. CV indicates cardiovascular; IS, ischemic stroke; KM, Kaplan‐Meier; and MI, myocardial infarction.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Event rates for the primary and individual end points by type of index acute coronary syndrome and use of revascularization.
Shown is the cumulative incidence of the primary end point (first occurrence of nonfatal MI, nonfatal ischemic stroke, or CV death) and individual end points (represented by components of the composite) by index ACS (MI/UA and revascularization status). Below each graph are data on the number of patients in each index ACS subgroup who are at risk of experiencing the corresponding end point. ACS indicates acute coronary syndrome; CV, cardiovascular; IS, ischemic stroke; MI, myocardial infarction; Revasc, revascularization; and UA, unstable angina.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Event rates for the primary and individual end points by categories of TIMI risk score for secondary prevention.
Shown is the cumulative incidence of the primary end point (first occurrence of nonfatal MI, nonfatal ischemic stroke, or CV death) and individual end points (represented by components of the composite) by TRS 2oP categories. Below each graph are data on the number of patients in each TRS 2oP category who are at risk of experiencing the corresponding end point. CV indicates cardiovascular; IS, ischemic stroke; MI, myocardial infarction; TIMI, Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction; and TRS 2oP, Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Risk Score for Secondary Prevention.
Figure 5
Figure 5. Event rates for the primary and individual end points by categories of TIMI risk score for secondary prevention and use of revascularization.
Shown is the cumulative incidence of the primary end point (first occurrence of nonfatal MI, nonfatal ischemic stroke, or CV death) and individual end points (represented by components of the composite) by TRS 2oP categories and use of revascularization. Below each graph are data on the number of patients in each TRS 2oP category with or without revascularization who are at risk of experiencing the corresponding end point. CV indicates cardiovascular; IS, ischemic stroke; MI, myocardial infarction; Revasc, revascularization; TIMI, Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction; and TRS 2oP, Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction Risk Score for Secondary Prevention.

References

    1. Sherman RE, Anderson SA, Dal Pan GJ, Gray GW, Gross T, Hunter NL, LaVange L, Marinac‐Dabic D, Marks PW, Robb MA, et al. Real‐world evidence—what is it and what can it tell us? N Engl J Med. 2016;375:2293–2297. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb1609216 - DOI - PubMed
    1. O’Gara PT, Kushner FG, Ascheim DD, Casey DE, Chung MK, de Lemos JA, Ettinger SM, Fang JC, Fesmire FM, Franklin BA, et al.; American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines . 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST‐elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2013;127:e362–e425. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e3182742cf6 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG, Casey DE Jr, Ganiats TG, Holmes DR Jr, Jaffe AS, Jneid H, Kelly RF, Kontos MC, et al.; ACC/AHA Task Force Members . 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non‐ST‐elevation acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2014;130:e344–e426. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000134. Epub 2014. Erratum in: Circulation. 2014;130:e433–4. Dosage error in article text. PMID: 25249585. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ibanez B, James S, Agewall S, Antunes MJ, Bucciarelli‐Ducci C, Bueno H, Caforio ALP, Crea F, Goudevenos JA, Halvorsen S, et al.; ESC Scientific Document Group . 2017 ESC guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST‐segment elevation. Eur Heart J. 2018;39:119–177. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx393 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Grundy SM, Stone NJ, Bailey AL, Beam C, Birtcher KK, Blumenthal RS, Braun LT, de Ferranti S, Faiella‐Tommasino J, Forman DE, et al. 2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA guideline on the management of blood cholesterol: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2019;139:e1082–e1143. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000625. Epub 2018. Erratum in: Circulation. 2019;139:e1182‐e1186. PMID: 30586774; PMCID: PMC7403606. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types