Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul;111(7):827-837.
doi: 10.1007/s00392-022-02024-z. Epub 2022 Apr 27.

Periprocedural myocardial injury according to optical characteristics of neointima and treatment modality of in-stent restenosis

Affiliations

Periprocedural myocardial injury according to optical characteristics of neointima and treatment modality of in-stent restenosis

Nejva Nano et al. Clin Res Cardiol. 2022 Jul.

Abstract

Aims: Aim of the present study was to investigate the impact of increasing neointimal inhomogeneity and neoatherosclerosis as well as of treatment modality of in-stent restenosis (ISR) on the occurrence of periprocedural myocardial injury (PMI).

Methods and results: Patients with normal or stable/falling increased baseline high-sensitivity troponin T (hs-cTnT) undergoing intravascular optical coherence tomography (OCT) and subsequent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of ISR by means of drug-coated balloon (DCB) or drug-eluting stent (DES) were included. Overall, 128 patients were subdivided into low (n = 64) and high (n = 64) inhomogeneity groups, based on the median of distribution of non-homogeneous quadrants. No significant between-group differences were detected in terms of hs-cTnT changes (28.0 [12.0-65.8] vs. 25.5 [9.8-65.0] ng/L; p = 0.355), or the incidence of major PMI (31.2 vs. 31.2%; p = 1.000). Similarly, no differences were observed between DCB- and DES-treated groups in terms of hs-cTn changes (27.0 [10.0-64.0] vs. 28.0 [11.0-73.0] ng/L; p = 0.795), or the incidence of major PMI (28.9 vs. 35.6%; p = 0.566). Additionally, no significant interaction was present between optical neointimal characteristics and treatment modality in terms of changes in hs-cTnT (Pint = 0.432). No significant differences in PMI occurrence were observed between low and high neoatherosclerosis subgroups.

Conclusions: In patients undergoing PCI for ISR, there was no association between increasing neointimal inhomogeneity, or increasing expression of neoatherosclerotic changes and occurrence of PMI. PMI occurrence was not influenced by the treatment modality (DCB vs. DES) of ISR lesions, a finding that supports the safety of DCB treatment for ISR.

Keywords: Drug-eluting balloon; Drug-eluting stent; In-stent restenosis; Neointimal characterization; Optical coherence tomography; Periprocedural myocardial injury.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No conflicts of interest related to the present work.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Images of optical coherence tomography findings in patients presenting with in-stent restenosis. A Homogeneous neointimal pattern. B Heterogeneous neointimal pattern. C Neoatherosclerosis with macrophage infiltration involving a 180° neointimal arc (arrows). D Neointimal calcification (arrow) * = guidewire artifact
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Cumulative frequency distribution curves for baseline A, peak post-procedural B and delta C high-sensitivity cardiac Troponin T concentration
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Cumulative frequency distribution curves for baseline (A), peak post-procedural B and delta C creatine kinase-MB concentration
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Two-year cumulative incidence of major adverse cardiac events according to neointimal tissue characterization CI confidence interval, HR hazard ratio, MACE major adverse cardiac events
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Two-year cumulative incidence of death or myocardial infarction according to neointimal tissue characterization CI confidence interval, HR hazard ratio, MI myocardial infarction
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Two-year cumulative incidence of target-lesion revascularization according to neointimal tissue characterization CI confidence interval, HR hazard ratio, TLR target-lesion revascularization

References

    1. Byrne RA, Joner M, Kastrati A. Stent thrombosis and restenosis: what have we learned and where are we going? The Andreas Gruntzig lecture ESC 2014. Eur Heart J. 2015;36(47):3320–3331. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv511. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Moussa ID, Mohananey D, Saucedo J, Stone GW, Yeh RW, Kennedy KF, Waksman R, Teirstein P, Moses JW, Simonton C. Trends and outcomes of restenosis after coronary stent implantation in the united states. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76(13):1521–1531. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.08.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Neumann FJ, Sousa-Uva M, Ahlsson A, Alfonso F, Banning AP, Benedetto U, Byrne RA, Collet JP, Falk V, Head SJ, Juni P, Kastrati A, Koller A, Kristensen SD, Niebauer J, Richter DJ, Seferovic PM, Sibbing D, Stefanini GG, Windecker S, Yadav R, Zembala MO. Group ESCSD 2018 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J. 2019;40(2):87–165. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy394. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ndrepepa G, Colleran R, Braun S, Cassese S, Hieber J, Fusaro M, Kufner S, Ott I, Byrne RA, Husser O, Hengstenberg C, Laugwitz KL, Schunkert H, Kastrati A. High-sensitivity troponin T and mortality after elective percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68(21):2259–2268. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.08.059. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zeitouni M, Silvain J, Guedeney P, Kerneis M, Yan Y, Overtchouk P, Barthelemy O, Hauguel-Moreau M, Choussat R, Helft G, Le Feuvre C, Collet JP, Montalescot G, Group AS. Periprocedural myocardial infarction and injury in elective coronary stenting. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(13):1100–1109. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx799. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms