[Single-versus Two-port Video-assisted Thoracic Surgery in Thymoma: A Propensity-matched Study]
- PMID: 35477189
- PMCID: PMC9051302
- DOI: 10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2022.101.15
[Single-versus Two-port Video-assisted Thoracic Surgery in Thymoma: A Propensity-matched Study]
Abstract
Background: In recent years, with the advancement of minimally invasive techniques, thoracoscopic thymoma resection has experienced a development process from three-port video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) to two-port (TP) and single-port (SP) variants. However, the feasibility and safety of SP-VATS have not been generally recognized. This study intends to explore the safety and feasibility of SP-VATS in thymoma resection, in order to provide a reference for clinical surgicalselection.
Methods: The clinical data of 197 patients who underwent thoracoscopic thymoma resection in Beijing Tongren Hospital from January 2018 to September 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into SP-VATS group (n=42) and TP-VATS group (n=155). After matching propensity scores, there is no statistically significant difference in preoperative baseline data between SP-VATS group and TP-VATS group. Among them, there were 17 males and 25 females with an average age of 28-72 (48.00±9.43) years in the SP-VATS group, and 20 males and 22 females with an average age of 30-75 (50.38±9.83) years in TP-VATS group. The clinical effects of the two groups were compared.
Results: The operation was successfully completed in both groups, and there was no conversion to thoracotomy or increased surgical incisions. Compared with the TP-VATS group, the chest drainage time and hospital stay in the SP-VATS group were shorter [(2.95±0.76) d vs (3.33±0.85) d; (4.57±0.83) d vs (5.07±1.13) d], and the visual pain score at 24 h and 72 h after surgery were lower [(3.64±0.85) points vs (4.05±0.66) points; (2.33±0.75) points vs (3.07±0.68) points] (P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in operation time [(130.00±26.23) min vs (135.24±27.03) min], intraoperative blood loss [(69.52±22.73) mL vs (82.38±49.23) mL] (P>0.05).
Conclusions: SP-VATS in thymoma is a safe, feasible, and less invasive procedure, with less postoperative pain and faster recovery than multi-port VATS.
【中文题目:单孔与单操作孔胸腔镜下胸腺瘤切除术的 临床疗效比较:一项倾向性评分匹配研究】 【中文摘要:背景与目的 近年来随着临床微创技术的不断进步,胸腔镜胸腺瘤切除术经历了从三孔操作到单操作孔、单孔的发展历程。然而,单孔胸腔镜技术的可行性及安全性尚未得到普遍认可。本研究拟探讨单孔胸腔镜手术在胸腺瘤切除中的安全性与可行性,以期为临床手术方式的选择提供参考。方法 回顾性分析2018年1月-2021年9月在北京同仁医院接受胸腔镜胸腺瘤切除手术治疗的197例患者的临床资料。按照手术方式将患者分为单孔胸腔镜胸腺瘤切除组(单孔组,n=42)和单操作孔胸腔镜胸腺瘤切除组(单操作孔组,n=155)。经倾向性评分匹配,单操作孔组获得与单孔组术前基线资料具有可比性的42例患者,其中单孔组男性17例、女性25例,年龄28-72(48.00±9.43)岁;单操作孔组男性20例、女性22例,年龄30-75(50.38±9.83)岁。对比两组的临床疗效。结果 两组均顺利完成手术,均无中转开胸或增加手术切口。单孔组和单操作孔组比较,胸腔引流时间和住院时间更短[(2.95±0.76) d vs (3.33±0.85) d; (4.57±0.83) d vs (5.07±1.13) d],术后24 h及72 h视觉疼痛评分更低[(3.64±0.85)分 vs (4.05±0.66)分;(2.33±0.75)分 vs (3.07±0.68)分],差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。单孔组、单操作孔组在手术时间[(130.00±26.23) min vs (135.24±27.03) min]、术中出血量[(69.52±22.73) mL vs (82.38±49.23) mL]等方面差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 单孔胸腔镜胸腺瘤切除术是一种安全、可行、更微创的术式,术后疼痛较多孔胸腔镜手术减轻,恢复更快。 】 【中文关键词:单孔;胸腺瘤;胸腔镜;倾向性评分匹配】.
Keywords: Propensity-score matching; Single-port; Thymoma; Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.
Conflict of interest statement
【
Figures
Similar articles
-
Short-term outcomes of single- versus multi-port video-assisted thoracic surgery in mediastinal diseases.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018 Jan 1;53(1):216-220. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezx217. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018. PMID: 29106491
-
Comparison of Subxiphoid and Intercostal Uniportal Thoracoscopic Thymectomy for Nonmyasthenic Early-Stage Thymoma: A Retrospective Single-Center Propensity-Score Matching Analysis.Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021 Mar;69(2):173-180. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1713878. Epub 2020 Sep 4. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021. PMID: 32886931
-
Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in the surgical treatment of Masaoka stage I thymoma.World J Surg Oncol. 2013 Jul 17;11:157. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-11-157. World J Surg Oncol. 2013. PMID: 23870330 Free PMC article.
-
Robot-assisted thoracic surgery versus video-assisted thoracic surgery for treatment of patients with thymoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Thorac Cancer. 2022 Jan;13(2):151-161. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.14234. Epub 2021 Nov 22. Thorac Cancer. 2022. PMID: 34806328 Free PMC article.
-
The perioperative outcomes of uniport versus two-port and three-port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022 Nov 8;17(1):284. doi: 10.1186/s13019-022-02034-y. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022. PMID: 36348498 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical