Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr 20;25(4):253-258.
doi: 10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2022.101.15.

[Single-versus Two-port Video-assisted Thoracic Surgery in Thymoma: A Propensity-matched Study]

[Article in Chinese]
Affiliations

[Single-versus Two-port Video-assisted Thoracic Surgery in Thymoma: A Propensity-matched Study]

[Article in Chinese]
Xingguo Yang et al. Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi. .

Abstract

Background: In recent years, with the advancement of minimally invasive techniques, thoracoscopic thymoma resection has experienced a development process from three-port video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) to two-port (TP) and single-port (SP) variants. However, the feasibility and safety of SP-VATS have not been generally recognized. This study intends to explore the safety and feasibility of SP-VATS in thymoma resection, in order to provide a reference for clinical surgicalselection.

Methods: The clinical data of 197 patients who underwent thoracoscopic thymoma resection in Beijing Tongren Hospital from January 2018 to September 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into SP-VATS group (n=42) and TP-VATS group (n=155). After matching propensity scores, there is no statistically significant difference in preoperative baseline data between SP-VATS group and TP-VATS group. Among them, there were 17 males and 25 females with an average age of 28-72 (48.00±9.43) years in the SP-VATS group, and 20 males and 22 females with an average age of 30-75 (50.38±9.83) years in TP-VATS group. The clinical effects of the two groups were compared.

Results: The operation was successfully completed in both groups, and there was no conversion to thoracotomy or increased surgical incisions. Compared with the TP-VATS group, the chest drainage time and hospital stay in the SP-VATS group were shorter [(2.95±0.76) d vs (3.33±0.85) d; (4.57±0.83) d vs (5.07±1.13) d], and the visual pain score at 24 h and 72 h after surgery were lower [(3.64±0.85) points vs (4.05±0.66) points; (2.33±0.75) points vs (3.07±0.68) points] (P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in operation time [(130.00±26.23) min vs (135.24±27.03) min], intraoperative blood loss [(69.52±22.73) mL vs (82.38±49.23) mL] (P>0.05).

Conclusions: SP-VATS in thymoma is a safe, feasible, and less invasive procedure, with less postoperative pain and faster recovery than multi-port VATS.

【中文题目:单孔与单操作孔胸腔镜下胸腺瘤切除术的 临床疗效比较:一项倾向性评分匹配研究】 【中文摘要:背景与目的 近年来随着临床微创技术的不断进步,胸腔镜胸腺瘤切除术经历了从三孔操作到单操作孔、单孔的发展历程。然而,单孔胸腔镜技术的可行性及安全性尚未得到普遍认可。本研究拟探讨单孔胸腔镜手术在胸腺瘤切除中的安全性与可行性,以期为临床手术方式的选择提供参考。方法 回顾性分析2018年1月-2021年9月在北京同仁医院接受胸腔镜胸腺瘤切除手术治疗的197例患者的临床资料。按照手术方式将患者分为单孔胸腔镜胸腺瘤切除组(单孔组,n=42)和单操作孔胸腔镜胸腺瘤切除组(单操作孔组,n=155)。经倾向性评分匹配,单操作孔组获得与单孔组术前基线资料具有可比性的42例患者,其中单孔组男性17例、女性25例,年龄28-72(48.00±9.43)岁;单操作孔组男性20例、女性22例,年龄30-75(50.38±9.83)岁。对比两组的临床疗效。结果 两组均顺利完成手术,均无中转开胸或增加手术切口。单孔组和单操作孔组比较,胸腔引流时间和住院时间更短[(2.95±0.76) d vs (3.33±0.85) d; (4.57±0.83) d vs (5.07±1.13) d],术后24 h及72 h视觉疼痛评分更低[(3.64±0.85)分 vs (4.05±0.66)分;(2.33±0.75)分 vs (3.07±0.68)分],差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。单孔组、单操作孔组在手术时间[(130.00±26.23) min vs (135.24±27.03) min]、术中出血量[(69.52±22.73) mL vs (82.38±49.23) mL]等方面差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 单孔胸腔镜胸腺瘤切除术是一种安全、可行、更微创的术式,术后疼痛较多孔胸腔镜手术减轻,恢复更快。 】 【中文关键词:单孔;胸腺瘤;胸腔镜;倾向性评分匹配】.

Keywords: Propensity-score matching; Single-port; Thymoma; Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests】The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

图 1
图 1
手术切口。A:切口内放置胸腔镜镜头、电钩和吸引器; B:切口位于腋中线偏前第4肋间,长2 cm-4 cm。 Surgical incision. A: The thoracoscopic lens, hook and suction are placed into the incision; B: The surgical incision is a 2 cm-4 cm incision in the 4th intercostal space anterior to midaxillary line.

Similar articles

References

    1. Weng W, Li X, Meng S, et al. Video-assisted thoracoscopic thymectomy is feasible for large thymomas: a propensity-matched comparison. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2020;30(4):565–572. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivz320. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Xu H, Liu D, Li Y, et al. The outcomes of subxiphoid thoracoscopic versus video-assisted thoracic surgery for thymic diseases. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2020;30(5):508–513. doi: 10.1089/lap.2019.0734. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Agatsuma H, Yoshida K, Yoshino I, et al. Video-assisted thoracic surgery thymectomy versus sternotomy thymectomy in patients with thymoma. Ann Thorac Surg. 2017;104(3):1047–1053. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.03.054. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yeung C, Dawson J, Gilbert S. Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopy approach to the management of non-pulmonary diseases of the chest. J Thorac Dis. 2019;11(16):S2062–S2068. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.03.21. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gonzalez-Rivas D, de la Torre M, Fernandez R, et al. Video: single- incision video-assisted thoracoscopic right pneumonectomy. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(7):2078–2079. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-2127-x. - DOI - PubMed