Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2022 Apr 27;22(1):324.
doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03371-1.

Healthcare students' attitudes towards patient centred care: a systematic review with meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Healthcare students' attitudes towards patient centred care: a systematic review with meta-analysis

Geronimo Bejarano et al. BMC Med Educ. .

Abstract

Background: Patient centred care is commonly recommended in clinical practice guidelines to improve patient outcomes and reduce healthcare costs. Identifying measurement tools used to assess healthcare students' attitudes towards patient centered care and determining their attitudes is the first step to ensuring patient centred care is provided in the future. The primary aim of this review was to describe the measurement tools used to assess healthcare students' attitudes towards patient centred care. The secondary aim was to quantify healthcare students' attitudes towards patient centred care.

Methods: An electronic database search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL from inception until March 1, 2021, with combined terms relating to 'patient centred care', 'attitudes', and 'healthcare students'. Studies that quantitatively assessed healthcare students' attitudes towards patient centred care were included. Measurement tools used in the included studies were qualitatively described. Meta-analysis was conducted to quantify healthcare students' attitudes towards patient centred care and assess the respective influence of gender, profession, and study geographical location on healthcare students' attitudes towards patient centred care.

Results: The electronic search identified 3948 total studies. One hundred twenty-nine full texts were screened, and 49 studies were included. There were 16 measurement tools used to assess healthcare students' attitudes towards patient centered care. Most studies (53%, n = 26) used the Patient-Practitioner Orientation Scale (PPOS) to assess patient centered care. Meta-analyses of 20 studies with 26 total groups resulted in a pooled mean PPOS score of 4.16 on a 0-6 scale (95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 3.95, 4.37), indicating low attitudes towards patient centered care. Additional analyses found that women have significantly higher attitudes towards patients centred care than men (pooled effect 0.14 [95% CI: 0.05, 0.23], n = 8 studies) and mean PPOS scores appear similar among sub-groups of only medical students (pooled mean 4.13, 95% CI: 3.85, 4.42, n = 13 studies) and only American healthcare students (pooled mean 4.49, 95% CI: 4.35, 4.64, n = 5 studies).

Conclusions: Several different measurement tools have been used to assess healthcare students' attitudes towards patient centred care, but the most commonly used is the PPOS. Our results indicate that healthcare students have low attitudes towards patient centred care. Future studies should evaluate if attitudes towards patient centred care can be improved during healthcare education.

Keywords: Patient centred; Patient-practitioner orientation scale; Students.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no activities, work, or financial relationships that could appear to influence this systematic review.

Figures

Fig.1
Fig.1
PRISMA flow chart of the records and study selection process
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Forest plot of mean pooled PPOS score and 95% CI for healthcare students
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Forest plot of mean PPOS score and 95% CI difference between female and male healthcare students
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
a-b Forest plots of mean PPOS score and 95% CI for medical students only

References

    1. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Quality of Health Care in America . Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century [Internet] Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2001. - PubMed
    1. Mead N, Bower P. Patient-centredness: a conceptual framework and review of the empirical literature. Soc Sci Med. 2000;51(7):1087–110. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00098-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ferreira PH, Ferreira ML, Maher CG, Refshauge KM, Latimer J, Adams RD. The therapeutic alliance between clinicians and patients predicts outcome in chronic low back pain. Phys Ther. 2013;93(4):470–478. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20120137. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fuentes J, Armijo-Olivo S, Funabashi M, Miciak M, Dick B, Warren S, et al. Enhanced therapeutic alliance modulates pain intensity and muscle pain sensitivity in patients with chronic low back pain: an experimental controlled study. Phys Ther. 2014;94(4):477–489. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20130118. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chan CMH, Ahmad WAW. Differences in physician attitudes towards patient-centredness: across four medical specialties. Int J Clin Pract. 2012;66(1):16–20. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2011.02831.x. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources