Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Jun;9(2):339-354.
doi: 10.1007/s40572-022-00351-x. Epub 2022 Apr 27.

A Review of the Effectiveness of Current US Policies on Antimicrobial Use in Meat and Poultry Production

Affiliations
Review

A Review of the Effectiveness of Current US Policies on Antimicrobial Use in Meat and Poultry Production

David Wallinga et al. Curr Environ Health Rep. 2022 Jun.

Abstract

Purpose: Industrial food animal production accounts for most animal-source protein consumed in the USA. These operations rely on an array of external inputs, which can include antimicrobials of medical importance. The use of these drugs in this context has been the subject of public health debate for decades because their widespread use contributes to the selection for and proliferation of drug-resistant bacteria and their genetic determinants. Here, we describe legislative and regulatory efforts, at different levels of governance in the USA, to curtail food animal consumption of medically important antimicrobials.

Recent findings: The features and relative success of the US efforts are examined alongside those of selected member states (Denmark and the Netherlands) of the European Union. Evaluation of efforts at all levels of US governance was complicated by shortcomings in prescribed data collection; nevertheless, available information suggests deficiencies in policy implementation and enforcement compromise the effectiveness of interventions pursued to date. The political will, robust systems for collecting and integrating data on antimicrobial consumption and use, and cross-sectoral collaboration that have been integral to the success of efforts in Denmark and The Netherlands have been notably absent in the USA, especially at the federal level.

Keywords: Antibiotic resistance; Antimicrobial use, Food animal production; Drug resistance, Microbial; Livestock; One Health; Policy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Total US livestock antibiotic sales in kilograms, by class and year. NIR, Antimicrobial drug classes with fewer than three distinct sponsors of approved and actively marketed animal drug products are reported collectively as “Not Independently Reported” (NIR)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Map of antibiotic use among producers in North America and Europe in mg antibiotic per PCU of livestock. Total consumption of medically important antimicrobials for terrestrial food-producing animals (cattle, dairy, swine, and poultry). Mg/PCU data and methodology for all European countries are from [43] “Sales of veterinary antimicrobial agents in 31 European countries in 2020.” (EMA/24309/2020), Available: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/report/sales-veterinary-antimicrobial-agents-31-european-countries-2019-2020-trends-2010-2020-eleventh_en.pdf. Canadian mg/PCU data are from 2018, and available from Public Health Canada, Canadian Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance System, 2020 Update. Available: https://www.canada.ca/content/dam/hc-sc/documents/services/drugs-health-products/canadian-antimicrobial-resistance-surveillance-system-2020-report/CARSS-2020-report-2020-eng.pdf; US antibiotic sales data (in kg/year) are from the 2020 Summary Report on Antimicrobials Sold or Distributed for Use in Food-Producing Animals. Available: https://www.fda.gov/media/133411/download. A description of the data sources and method for converting these US sales data to mg/PCU is provided in the Supplement
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Total sales of medically important antimicrobials in 1000 kg in North American and European countries. Total sales of medically important antimicrobials for terrestrial food-producing animals (cattle, dairy, swine, and poultry) in 2020, except for Canada (whose data are from 2018)

References

    1. United States Department of Agriculture. 2019. 2017 census of agriculture: summary and state data, volume 1. Geographic area series. Part 51. Available: https://www.nass.usda.gov/Publications/AgCensus/2017/Full_Report/Volume_... 16 April 2020].
    1. Casey JA, Kim BF, Larsen J, Price LB, Nachman KE. Industrial food animal production and community health. Current Environmental Health Reports. 2015;2:259–271. doi: 10.1007/s40572-015-0061-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. United States Food and Drug Administration. 2013b. Guidance for industy # 213: new animal drugs and new animal drug combination products administered in or on medicated feed or drinking water of foodproducing animals: recommendations for drug sponsors for voluntarily aligning product use conditions with gfi #209 Available: https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents... 16 April 2020].
    1. United States Food and Drug Administration. 2017a. Potential approach for defining durations of use for medically important antimicrobial drugs intended for use in or on feed: a concept paper. Available: https://www.fda.gov/media/144927/download 15 March 2021].
    1. Patel SJ, Wellington M, Shah RM, Ferreira MJ. Antibiotic stewardship in food-producing animals: challenges, progress, and opportunities. Clin Ther. 2020;42:1649–1658. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2020.07.004. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources