Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr 28;7(1):11.
doi: 10.1186/s41256-022-00244-4.

Perceived roles, benefits and barriers of virtual global health partnership initiatives: a cross-sectional exploratory study

Lisa Umphrey #  1   2 , George Paasi #  3 , William Windsor  4 , Grace Abongo  3 , Jessica Evert  5 , Heather Haq  6 , Elizabeth M Keating  7 , Suet Kam Lam  8 , Megan S McHenry  9 , Carolyne Ndila  3 , Charles Nwobu  5   10 , Amy Rule  11 , Reena P Tam  12 , Daniel Olson #  13   4 , Peter Olupot-Olupot #  3   14
Affiliations

Perceived roles, benefits and barriers of virtual global health partnership initiatives: a cross-sectional exploratory study

Lisa Umphrey et al. Glob Health Res Policy. .

Abstract

Background: Virtual global health partnership initiatives (VGHPIs) evolved rapidly during the COVID-19 pandemic to ensure partnership continuity. However the current landscape for VGHPI use and preference is unknown. This study aimed to increase understanding of GH partners' perspectives on VGHPIs.

Methods: From 15 October to 30 November 2020, An online, international survey was conducted using snowball sampling to document pandemic-related changes in partnership activities, preferences for VGHPIs, and perceived acceptability and barriers. The survey underwent iterative development within a diverse author group, representing academic and clinical institutions, and the non-profit sector. Participants from their professional global health networks were invited, including focal points for global health partnerships while excluding trainees and respondents from the European Economic Area. Analysis stratified responses by country income classification and partnership type. Authors used descriptive statistics to characterize responses, defining statistical significance as α = 0.05.

Results: A total of 128 respondents described 219 partnerships. 152/219 (69%) partnerships were transnational, 157/219 (72%) were of > 5 years duration, and 127/219 (60%) included bidirectional site visits. High-income country (HIC) partners sent significantly more learners to low- to middle-income country (LMIC) partner sites (p < 0.01). Participants commented on pandemic-related disruptions affecting 217/219 (99%) partnerships; 195/217 (90%) were disruption to activities; 122/217 (56%) to communication; 73/217 (34%) to access to professional support; and 72/217 (33%) to funding. Respondents indicated that VGHPIs would be important to 206/219 (94%) of their partnerships moving forward. There were overall differences in resource availability, technological capacity, and VGHPI preferences between LMIC and HIC respondents, with a statistically significant difference in VGHPI acceptability (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between groups regarding VGHPIs' perceived barriers.

Conclusions: The pandemic disrupted essential partnership elements, compounding differences between LMIC and HIC partners in their resources and preferences for partnership activities. VGHPIs have the potential to bridge new and existing gaps and maximize gains, bi-directionality, and equity in partnerships during and after COVID-19.

Keywords: Global health; Pandemic; Partnership; Virtual.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Most highly preferred virtual global Health partnership initiatives (VGHPIs) during the COVID-19 pandemic
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Technological capacity for virtual global health partnership initiatives (VGHPIs) among respondents
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Steenhoff AP, Crouse HL, Lukolyo H, Larson CP, Howard C, Mazhani L, et al. Partnerships for global child health. Pediatrics. 2017;140(4):10. doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-3823. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rowthorn V. Global/local: what does it mean for global health educators and how do we do it? Ann Glob Health. 2015;81(5):593–601. doi: 10.1016/j.aogh.2015.12.001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Beaglehole R, Bonita R. What is global health? Glob Health Action. 2010;3:5142. doi: 10.3402/gha.v3i0.5142. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Koplan JP, Bond TC, Merson MH, Reddy KS, Rodriguez MH, Sewankambo NK, et al. Towards a common definition of global health. Lancet. 2009;373(9679):1993–1995. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60332-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fried LP, Bentley ME, Buekens P, Burke DS, Frenk JJ, Klag MJ, et al. Global health is public health. Lancet. 2010;375(9714):535–537. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60203-6. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types