Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 May 6:2:100020.
doi: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2021.100020. eCollection 2021 Jun.

A systematic review of pharmaceutical price mark-up practice and its implementation

Affiliations
Review

A systematic review of pharmaceutical price mark-up practice and its implementation

Kah Seng Lee et al. Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. .

Abstract

Pharmaceutical products, apart from being essential for medical treatment, are of high value and heavily regulated to ensure the prices are controlled. This systematic review was conducted to identify pharmaceutical pricing mark-up control measures, specifically in the wholesale and retail sectors. The search method comprised the following databases: PubMed, Science Direct, Springer Link, ProQuest, and EBSCOhost and Google Scholar. The results were filtered systematically from the inception of the aforementioned databases until 23 April 2021. Eligible studies were those focusing on the implementation of pharmaceutical pricing strategies that involve a) mark-ups of medicine, and b) pharmaceutical cost control measures. A total of 13 studies were included in this review: seven covered European countries, four covered Asian countries, one covered the USA and one covered Canada. The main points of discussion in the qualitative synthesis were the implementation of medicine mark-ups, price mark-up regulatory strategies and the outcomes of these regulatory strategies. Our findings suggest that Western countries have a lower mark-up margin, around 4% to 25% of the original purchased price, compared to Asian countries, up to 50%.

Keywords: Cost control; Drug costs; Healthcare costs; Pharmaceutical economics; Prescription fees; Price list.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA diagram demonstrating the search strategy and its results.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Espin J., Rovira J., Labry A.O.D. Review Series on Pharmaceutical Pricing Policies and Interventions 2011. 2011. Who/hai project on medicine prices and availability. Working Paper 1: External Reference Pricing.
    1. Shaw B., Mestre-Ferrandiz J. Talkin’ about a resolution: issues in the push for greater transparency of medicine prices. Pharmacoeconomics. 2020;38(2):125–134. doi: 10.1007/s40273-019-00877-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Espin J., Schlander M., Godman B., et al. Projecting pharmaceutical expenditure in eu5 to 2021: adjusting for the impact of discounts and rebates. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2018;16(6):803–817. doi: 10.1007/s40258-018-0419-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ondo Z. Regulatory analysis of mark-up structure in medicine prices by the pharmaceutical industry in south africa. J Pharm Care Health Syst. 2019;6(2):203. doi: 10.35248/2376-0419.19.6.203. - DOI
    1. Miller B.J., Wilensky G. New drugs, new ideas: payment policy innovations for high-cost pharmaceuticals. Milbank Q. 2019;97(4):922–925. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12422. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources