Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun 23;139(25):3647-3654.
doi: 10.1182/blood.2022015892.

Intervening on the storage time of RBC units and its effects on adverse recipient outcomes using real-world data

Affiliations

Intervening on the storage time of RBC units and its effects on adverse recipient outcomes using real-world data

Peter Bruun-Rasmussen et al. Blood. .

Abstract

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have found no evidence that the storage time of transfused red blood cell (RBC) units affects recipient survival. However, inherent difficulties in conducting RBC transfusion RCTs have prompted critique of their design, analyses, and interpretation. Here, we address these issues by emulating hypothetical randomized trials using large real-world data to further clarify the adverse effects of storage time. We estimated the comparative effect of transfusing exclusively older vs fresher RBC units on the primary outcome of death, and the secondary composite end point of thromboembolic events, or death, using inverse probability weighting. Thresholds were defined as 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks of storage. A large Danish blood transfusion database from the period 2008 to 2018 comprising >900 000 transfusion events defined the observational data. A total of 89 799 patients receiving >340 000 RBC transfusions during 28 days of follow-up met the eligibility criteria. Treatment with RBC units exclusively fresher than 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks of storage was found to decrease the 28-day recipient mortality with 2.44 percentage points (pp) (0.86 pp, 4.02 pp), 1.93 pp (0.85 pp, 3.02 pp), 1.06 pp (-0.20 pp, 2.33 pp), and -0.26 pp (-1.78 pp, 1.25 pp) compared with transfusing exclusively older RBC units, respectively. The 28-day risk differences for the composite end point were similar. This study suggests that transfusing exclusively older RBC units stored for >1 or 2 weeks increases the 28-day recipient mortality and risk of thromboembolism or death compared with transfusing fresher RBC units.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None
Graphical abstract
Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flowchart of eligible patients and transfusion records, the Capital Region of Denmark transfusion database, 2008 to 2018.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
The estimated average survival probability under each treatment strategy (fresher vs older RBC units) and for the current practice (natural course) up to 28 days after the baseline transfusion with 95% confidence intervals for the mortality analyses.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
The estimated average treatment effect between treatment with exclusively fresher vs older RBC units up to 28 days after the baseline transfusion with 95% confidence intervals for the mortality analyses.

References

    1. Takei T, Amin NA, Schmid G, Dhingra-Kumar N, Rugg D. Progress in global blood safety for HIV. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2009;52(suppl 2):S127-S131. - PubMed
    1. Zimring JC. Established and theoretical factors to consider in assessing the red cell storage lesion. Blood. 2015;125(14):2185-2190. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hess JR. Red cell changes during storage. Transfus Apheresis Sci. 2010;43(1):51-59. - PubMed
    1. Koch CG, Li L, Sessler DI, et al. Duration of red-cell storage and complications after cardiac surgery. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(12):1229-1239. - PubMed
    1. Wang D, Sun J, Solomon SB, Klein HG, Natanson C. Transfusion of older stored blood and risk of death: a meta-analysis. Transfusion. 2012;52(6):1184-1195. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types