Imipenem (N-F-thienamycin) versus netilmicin plus clindamycin. A controlled and randomized comparison in intra-abdominal infections
- PMID: 3548611
- PMCID: PMC1492722
- DOI: 10.1097/00000658-198703000-00009
Imipenem (N-F-thienamycin) versus netilmicin plus clindamycin. A controlled and randomized comparison in intra-abdominal infections
Abstract
In a randomized study the clinical and bacteriologic effectiveness of imipenem was compared with the classical combination of netilmicin with clindamycin in patients who had surgery for an intraperitoneal infection, localized or generalized, with positive bacteriologic findings of the specimen taken at surgery. Excluded were all patients who received other antibiotics before surgery, or who died within 3 days after antibiotic therapy was started. Imipenem was given at a dose of 500 mg t.i.d., clindamycin 600 mg t.i.d., and netilmicin according to serum levels. The diagnoses ranged from postoperative peritonitis, gallbladder empyema, perforated gastroduodenal ulcer, small bowel perforation with and without obstruction, and perforated appendicitis to perforation of the colon. The bacteriologic work-up included examination of the primary specimen (aerobic and anaerobic), the urine, feces, and serologic testing for Candida albicans once or twice a week and after the course of antibiotic therapy. In addition, pH measurements of abscesses and drainage fluids were performed. Ninety-three patients entered the study. Forty-seven patients were treated with imipenem (test group), and 46 patients were treated with the combination therapy (control group). The two groups did not show significant differences in age, sex, diagnostic groups, risk factors, primary bacteriology, and duration of therapy (mean: 6.7 days). Thirty-eight patients (80.9%) treated with imipenem were cured, six patients (12.8%) were improved, and there were three (6.4%) failures. The respective numbers for the control group were 31 (67.4%), 10 (21.7%), and 5 (10.9%). The mean duration of hospitalization was 19 days for the test group and 24.5 days for the control group. There were four wound infections in the test group and 11 wound infections in the control group. Imipenem is at least as effective in the adjuvant therapy of intra-abdominal infections as the combination of netilmicin with clindamycin.
Similar articles
-
Imipenem/cilastatin versus aminoglycoside plus amoxicillin plus clindamycin in the treatment of serious postoperative infections.Scand J Infect Dis Suppl. 1987;52:11-4. Scand J Infect Dis Suppl. 1987. PMID: 3331039 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparative study of netilmicin/tinidazole versus netilmicin/clindamycin in the treatment of severe abdominal infections.Scand J Infect Dis. 1984;16(3):297-303. doi: 10.3109/00365548409070404. Scand J Infect Dis. 1984. PMID: 6494811 Clinical Trial.
-
The treatment of gynaecological and intra-abdominal infections: a comparative study of cefotetan versus netilmicin plus clindamycin.Chemioterapia. 1988 Aug;7(4):253-5. Chemioterapia. 1988. PMID: 3180305 Clinical Trial.
-
Moxalactam vs tobramycin-clindamycin. A randomized trial in secondary peritonitis.Arch Surg. 1988 Jun;123(6):714-7. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1988.01400300060009. Arch Surg. 1988. PMID: 3285809 Review.
-
Therapy of mixed anaerobic-aerobic infections. Lessons from studies of intra-abdominal sepsis.Am J Med. 1985 Jun 7;78(6A):145-53. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(85)90118-4. Am J Med. 1985. PMID: 3890535 Review.
Cited by
-
The treatment of severe intra-abdominal infections: the role of piperacillin/tazobactam.Intensive Care Med. 1994 Jul;20 Suppl 3:S35-8. doi: 10.1007/BF01745249. Intensive Care Med. 1994. PMID: 7962987 Review.
-
Piperacillin/tazobactam in the treatment of polymicrobial infections.Intensive Care Med. 1994 Jul;20 Suppl 3:S27-34. doi: 10.1007/BF01745248. Intensive Care Med. 1994. PMID: 7962986 Review.
-
Optimal Treatment for Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections in the Era of Antibiotic Resistance: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Combined Therapy With Metronidazole.Open Forum Infect Dis. 2016 Jul 7;3(3):ofw143. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofw143. eCollection 2016 Sep. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2016. PMID: 27704002 Free PMC article.
-
Current antimicrobial therapy of anaerobic infections.Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1992 Nov;11(11):999-1011. doi: 10.1007/BF01967790. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1992. PMID: 1295770 Review.
-
Cost effectiveness of ciprofloxacin plus metronidazole versus imipenem-cilastatin in the treatment of intra-abdominal infections.Pharmacoeconomics. 1999 Nov;16(5 Pt 2):551-61. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199916050-00011. Pharmacoeconomics. 1999. PMID: 10662480 Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1980 Jun;17(6):993-1000 - PubMed
-
- Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1980 Oct;18(4):642-4 - PubMed
-
- Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1981 Aug 4;111(31-32):1169-83 - PubMed
-
- Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1982 Jan;21(1):180-7 - PubMed
-
- Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1982 Jul;22(1):62-70 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical