Instruments to measure skills and knowledge of physicians and medical students in palliative care: A systematic review of psychometric properties
- PMID: 35486883
- DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2022.2067033
Instruments to measure skills and knowledge of physicians and medical students in palliative care: A systematic review of psychometric properties
Abstract
Purpose: Palliative care is constantly increasing around the world. The knowledge and skills of future physicians in this area are crucial. This study evaluates the psychometric properties of knowledge and skills questionnaires used in palliative care, validated by physicians or medical students based on the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) methodology.
Methods: A systematic review was carried out in Cosmin Databases, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, SciELO, Cinahl, and Medline up to September 2020 (updated June 2021), based on the COSMIN methodology and PRISMA recommendations. The psychometric properties of each included questionnaire were identified. Methodological quality, quality of results, and quality of evidence were evaluated.
Results: The search strategy yielded 12 questionnaires assessing the knowledge and skills of physicians or medical students. The Palliative Care Knowledge Questionnaire for PEACE (PEACE-Q) and Palliative Care Knowledge Test (PCKT) were the instruments with the highest scores for methodological quality, quality of results, and quality of evidence-based on the COSMIN methodology.
Conclusions: PEACE-Q and PCKT should be the preferred choice to assess palliative care knowledge and skills in physicians. In-depth studies following COSMIN validation criteria are recommended to improve the psychometric properties and cross-cultural validation of the questionnaires.
Keywords: Palliative care; education; knowledge; legal medicine; questionnaires.
Similar articles
-
The suffering measurement instruments in palliative care: A systematic review of psychometric properties.Int J Nurs Stud. 2020 Oct;110:103704. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103704. Epub 2020 Jul 10. Int J Nurs Stud. 2020. PMID: 32717488
-
Palliative care knowledge test for nurses and physicians: validation and cross-cultural adaptation.BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2022 Sep;12(3):324-331. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2019-002182. Epub 2020 Apr 22. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2022. PMID: 32321727
-
Evaluating patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for bladder cancer: a systematic review using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist.BJU Int. 2018 Nov;122(5):760-773. doi: 10.1111/bju.14368. Epub 2018 Jun 8. BJU Int. 2018. PMID: 29726085 Free PMC article.
-
Suffering measurement instruments in palliative care: protocol for a systematic psychometric review.BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 3;9(4):e027524. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027524. BMJ Open. 2019. PMID: 30948616 Free PMC article.
-
Instruments for the identification of patients in need of palliative care in the hospital setting: a systematic review of measurement properties.JBI Evid Synth. 2022 Mar 1;20(3):761-787. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-20-00555. JBI Evid Synth. 2022. PMID: 34812189
Cited by
-
Mixed-method evaluation of a culturally-adapted basic palliative care curriculum for practicing physicians in mainland China.BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jul 24;25(1):1109. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07665-y. BMC Med Educ. 2025. PMID: 40707884 Free PMC article.
-
Enhancing medical students' understanding of end-of-life care ethics and law through video-triggered expert-led debriefing: a two-stage study.BMC Med Educ. 2024 Nov 9;24(1):1285. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06304-2. BMC Med Educ. 2024. PMID: 39522007 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources