Diagnostic accuracy of an automated artificial intelligence derived right ventricular to left ventricular diameter ratio tool on CT pulmonary angiography to predict pulmonary hypertension at right heart catheterisation

Abstract

Aim: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of an automated artificial intelligence derived right ventricle/left ventricle diameter ratio (RV/LV) computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) analysis tool to detect pulmonary hypertension (PH) in patients with suspected PH referred to a specialist centre.

Materials and methods: The present study was a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of 202 consecutive patients with suspected PH, who underwent CTPA within 12 months of right heart catheterisation (RHC). Automated ventricular segmentation and RV/LV calculation (Imbio LLC, Minneapolis, MN, USA) was undertaken on the CTPA images. PH diagnosis was made using the RHC reference standard.

Results: The automated RV/LV correlated more strongly with RHC metrics than main pulmonary artery (MPA) diameter and MPA to ascending aorta diameter ratio (MPA/AA) measured manually (mean pulmonary arterial pressure [mPAP] r=0.535, R² = 0.287 p<0.001; pulmonary vascular resistance [PVR] r=0.607, R² = 0.369 p<0.001). In the derivation cohort (n=100), the area under the receiver-operating curve for automated RV/LV discriminating PH was 0.752 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.677-0.827, p<0.001). Using an optimised Youden's Index of ≥1.12 classified from derivation, automated RV/LV ratio analysis was more sensitive for the detection of PH with higher positive predictive value (PPV) when compared with manual MPA and MPA/AA in the validation cohort (n=102). Automated RV/LV compromise (1.12) and specific (1.335) thresholds were strongly predictive of mortality (log-rank 7.401, p=0.007 and log-rank 16.075, p<0.001 respectively).

Conclusion: In suspected PH, automated RV/LV diameter thresholds have high sensitivity for PH, outperform manual MPA and MPA/AA and can predict survival.