Application of PREVENA (Surgical Incision Protection System) in reducing surgical site infections following reversal of ileostomy or colostomy: the PRIC study protocol
- PMID: 35487978
- PMCID: PMC9072509
- DOI: 10.1007/s00384-022-04153-3
Application of PREVENA (Surgical Incision Protection System) in reducing surgical site infections following reversal of ileostomy or colostomy: the PRIC study protocol
Abstract
Aim: There is a current lack of evidence in the literature to support the routine use of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) to reduce the risk of surgical site infections (SSI) in the setting of ileostomy or colostomy reversal. The aim of this study is to examine whether routine NPWT confers a lower rate of SSI than conventional dressings following reversal of ileostomy or colostomy.
Methods: The PRIC study is a randomized, controlled, open-label, multi-centre superiority trial to assess whether routine NPWT following wound closure confers a lower rate of SSI following reversal of ileostomy or colostomy when compared to conventional dressings. Participants will be consecutively identified and recruited. Eligible participants will be randomized in a 1:1 allocation ratio, to receive either the NPWT (PREVENA) dressings or conventional dressings which will be applied immediately upon completion of surgery. PREVENA dressings will remain applied for a duration of 7 days. Surgical wounds will then be examined on post-operative day seven as well as during follow-up appointments in OPD for any evidence of SSI. In the interim, public health nurses (PHN) will provide out-patient support services incorporating wound assessment and care as part of a routine basis. Study investigators will liaise with PHN to gather the relevant data in relation to the time to wound healing. Our primary endpoint is the incidence of SSI within 30 days of stoma reversal. Secondary endpoints include measuring time to wound healing, evaluating wound healing and aesthetics and assessing patient satisfaction.
Conclusion: The PRIC study will assess whether routine NPWT following wound closure is superior to conventional dressings in the reduction of SSI following reversal of ileostomy or colostomy and ascertain whether routine NPWT should be considered the new standard of care.
Keywords: Colorectal surgery; Colostomy; Ileostomy; Negative pressure dressings; PREVENA therapy; Reversal surgery; Surgical site infection.
© 2022. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
The use of negative pressure wound therapy following stoma reversal: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Int J Colorectal Dis. 2025 Mar 20;40(1):73. doi: 10.1007/s00384-025-04865-2. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2025. PMID: 40111521 Free PMC article.
-
Prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy to improve wound healing rates following ileostomy closure: a randomized controlled trial.ANZ J Surg. 2024 Sep;94(9):1627-1633. doi: 10.1111/ans.18941. Epub 2024 Mar 25. ANZ J Surg. 2024. PMID: 38525845 Clinical Trial.
-
Prophylactic negative-pressure wound therapy after ileostomy reversal for the prevention of wound healing complications in colorectal cancer patients: a randomized controlled trial.Tech Coloproctol. 2021 Feb;25(2):185-193. doi: 10.1007/s10151-020-02372-w. Epub 2020 Nov 7. Tech Coloproctol. 2021. PMID: 33161523 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Evaluation of negative-pressure wound therapy for surgical site infections after ileostomy closure in colorectal cancer patients: a prospective multicenter study.Surg Today. 2020 Dec;50(12):1687-1693. doi: 10.1007/s00595-020-02068-6. Epub 2020 Jul 7. Surg Today. 2020. PMID: 32638132
-
Comparison of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Systems and Conventional Non-Pressure Dressings on Surgical Site Infection Rate After Stoma Reversal: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.J Clin Med. 2025 Feb 28;14(5):1654. doi: 10.3390/jcm14051654. J Clin Med. 2025. PMID: 40095625 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
The use of negative pressure wound therapy following stoma reversal: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Int J Colorectal Dis. 2025 Mar 20;40(1):73. doi: 10.1007/s00384-025-04865-2. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2025. PMID: 40111521 Free PMC article.
-
Risk factors analysis of surgical site infections in postoperative colorectal cancer: a nine-year retrospective study.BMC Surg. 2023 Oct 24;23(1):320. doi: 10.1186/s12893-023-02231-z. BMC Surg. 2023. PMID: 37872509 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Kartal K, Citgez B, Koksal MH, Besler E, Akgun İE, Mihmanli M. Colostomy reversal after a Hartmann's procedure Effects of experience on mortality and morbidity. Ann Ital Chir. 2019;90:539–544. - PubMed
-
- Hsieh MC, Kuo LT, Chi CC, Huang WS, Chin CC. Pursestring Closure versus Conventional Primary Closure Following Stoma Reversal to Reduce Surgical Site Infection Rate: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Dis Colon Rectum. 2015;58(8):808–815. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000401. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
