Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Sep;36(7):735-741.
doi: 10.1111/bioe.13042. Epub 2022 Apr 30.

Environmental justice and climate change policies

David B Resnik  1
Affiliations

Environmental justice and climate change policies

David B Resnik. Bioethics. 2022 Sep.

Abstract

Climate change is an environmental justice issue because it is likely to cause disproportionate harm to low-income countries and low-income populations in higher-income countries. While climate change mitigation and adaptation policies may be able to minimize these harms, they could make them worse unless they are developed and implemented with an eye toward promoting justice and fairness. Those who view climate change as an environmental justice issue should be wary of endorsing policies that sound like they promote the cause of social and economic justice, but in fact do not. While climate change policies may help to mitigate the effects of climate change on poor people, there is no guarantee that they will be just at the local, national, or global level. Those who care about global climate justice must remain actively engaged in policy formation and implementation to ensure that justice does not get shortchanged in the response to global warming.

Keywords: climate change; environmental justice; justice; politics; public policy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Bullard RD (Ed). (1993). Confronting environmental racism: Voices from the grassroots. South End Press;
    2. Bullard RD (1994). Unequal protection: Environmental justice and communities of color. Sierra Club Books;
    3. Chavis BF, & Lee C (1987). Toxic wastes and race in the United States. United Church of Christ.
    1. Shrader-Frechette KS (2002). Environmental justice: Creating equality, reclaiming democracy. Oxford University Press.
    1. Bullard RD, & Johnson GS (2000). Environmental justice: Grassroots activism and its impact on public policy decision making. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 555–578.
    1. United Church of Christ, Commission for Racial Justice. (1987). Toxic wastes and race in the United States: A national report on the racial and socioeconomic characteristics of communities with hazardous waste sites. United Church of Christ;
    2. Maantay JA, & McLafferty S (Eds.). (2011). Geospatial analysis and environmental health. Springer;
    3. Mohai P, Pellow D, & Roberts JT (2009). Environmental justice. Annual Review of Environmental Resources, 34, 405–430;
    4. Schlosberg D (2009). Defining environmental justice: Theories, movements, and nature. Oxford University Press;
    5. Walker G (2012). Environmental justice: Concepts, evidence, and politics. Routledge;
    6. Mohai P, & Saha R (2015). Which came first, people or pollution? A review of theory and evidence from longitudinal environmental justice studies. Environmental Research Letters, 10, 125011.
    1. Mohai et al. , op. cit note 4.

Publication types