Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Jun 20;377(1853):20210155.
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0155. Epub 2022 May 2.

Potential effects of nectar microbes on pollinator health

Affiliations
Review

Potential effects of nectar microbes on pollinator health

Valerie N Martin et al. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. .

Abstract

Floral nectar is prone to colonization by nectar-adapted yeasts and bacteria via air-, rain-, and animal-mediated dispersal. Upon colonization, microbes can modify nectar chemical constituents that are plant-provisioned or impart their own through secretion of metabolic by-products or antibiotics into the nectar environment. Such modifications can have consequences for pollinator perception of nectar quality, as microbial metabolism can leave a distinct imprint on olfactory and gustatory cues that inform foraging decisions. Furthermore, direct interactions between pollinators and nectar microbes, as well as consumption of modified nectar, have the potential to affect pollinator health both positively and negatively. Here, we discuss and integrate recent findings from research on plant-microbe-pollinator interactions and their consequences for pollinator health. We then explore future avenues of research that could shed light on the myriad ways in which nectar microbes can affect pollinator health, including the taxonomic diversity of vertebrate and invertebrate pollinators that rely on this reward. This article is part of the theme issue 'Natural processes influencing pollinator health: from chemistry to landscapes'.

Keywords: nectar chemistry; nectar microbe; plant-pollinator; pollinator health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

We declare we have no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Potential mechanisms by which nectar microbes could affect pollinator health. In this review, the following mechanisms are considered: (i) microbe–microbe interactions in the nectar environment, (ii) microbial impacts on nectar nutritional quality, and (iii) microbial impacts on cues important for pollinator foraging. Figure created with BioRender.com. (Online version in colour.)
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Floral visitor diversity and the nectar microbiome. (a) Common, effective pollinators typically include members of the insect orders Hymenoptera and Lepidoptera, as well as nectarivorous birds and bats. (b) Lesser-studied pollinators include non-flying mammals, reptiles and beetles. (c) Nectar thieves, including (d) thrips, can vector microbes that can then affect pollinator foraging. (e) Nectar robbers can have similar effects. Figure created with BioRender.com. (Online version in colour.)

References

    1. Ananthakrishnan TN. 1982. Thrips and pollination biology. Curr. Sci. 51, 168-172.
    1. Kress WJ, Schatz GE, Andrianifahanana M, Morland HS. 1994. Pollination of Ravenala madagascariensis (Strelitziaceae) by lemurs in Madagascar: evidence for an archaic coevolutionary system? Am. J. Bot. 81, 542-551. (10.1002/j.1537-2197.1994.tb15483.x) - DOI
    1. Simpson BB, Neff JL. 1983. Floral biology and floral rewards of Lysimachia (Primulaceae). Am. Midl. Nat. 110, 249-256. (10.2307/2425266) - DOI
    1. Percival MS. 1961. Types of nectar in angiosperms. New Phytol. 60, 235-281. (10.1111/j.1469-8137.1961.tb06255.x) - DOI
    1. Baker HG, Baker I. 1983. Floral nectar constituents in relation to pollinator type. In Handbook of Experimental Pollination Biology (eds Jones CE, Little RJ), pp. 117-141. New York, USA: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources