Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar 4;10(1):coac009.
doi: 10.1093/conphys/coac009. eCollection 2022.

Physiological acclimation of elk during population restoration in the Missouri Ozarks, USA

Affiliations

Physiological acclimation of elk during population restoration in the Missouri Ozarks, USA

Ellen M Pero et al. Conserv Physiol. .

Abstract

Conservation translocations-the intentional movement of animals to restore populations-have increased over the past 30 years to halt and reverse species declines and losses. However, there are many challenges translocated animals face that should be considered for restoration programs to be successful. Understanding how long it takes for translocated animals to acclimate to these challenges and their new landscape is a critical component of post-release population management. Physiological measures such as hormone responses are increasingly used to assess animal responses and acclimation to disturbances including translocation. We determined the physiological acclimation period of elk (Cervus canadensis) translocated to the Missouri Ozarks, USA, as part of a restoration effort. From 2011 to 2013, we translocated 108 GPS-radio-collared elk from Kentucky, USA, to Missouri, USA, and collected faecal samples for glucocorticoid metabolite extraction to use as an indicator of physiological acclimation. We modelled the response of population-wide faecal glucocorticoid metabolites (fGCMs) across the initial 9 years of the restoration in response to days following release and additional site-specific covariates. Presence of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) hunts and monthly precipitation levels were positively and negatively associated with fGCM levels, respectively. Concurrent with influences from site-specific conditions on the release landscape, fGCM levels declined following release. We identified a breakpoint in fGCM decline at ~42 days following translocation releases suggesting elk acclimated physiologically relatively quickly compared to other species. The fast physiological acclimation by Missouri elk suggests effective use of temporary post-release management efforts. Determining how quickly animals acclimate following translocations allows researchers to tailor post-release management plans to each species' needs, thus maximizing the success of future translocation efforts while minimizing costs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Predicted effect of average monthly precipitation on fGCM response in the restored Missouri elk (C. canadensis) population in the initial 9 years of restoration (2011–2019).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Predicted effect of the presence (no/yes) of a white-tailed deer (O. virginianus) hunt within a 10-day window on fGCM response in the restored Missouri elk (C. canadensis) population in the initial 9 years of restoration (2011–2019).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Predicted effect of days from the most recent translocation release on fGCM response in the restored Missouri elk (C. canadensis) population in the initial 9 years of restoration (2011–2019), with estimated breakpoint and indication of physiological acclimation occurring at ~42 days. Rugs indicate sampling occurrences.

References

    1. Armstrong DP, Le Coeur C, Thorne JM, Panfylova J, Lovegrove TG, Frost PG, Ewen JG (2017) Using Bayesian mark-recapture modelling to quantify the strength and duration of post-release effects in reintroduced populations. Biol Conserv 215: 39–45.
    1. Armstrong DP, Reynolds MH (2012) Modelling reintroduced populations: the state of the art and future directions. In Ewen JG, Armstrong DP, Parker KA, Seddon PJ, eds, Reintroduction Biology: Integrating Science and Management. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester, UK, pp. 165–222
    1. Aubry KB, Lewis JC (2003) Extirpation and reintroduction of fishers (Martes pennanti) in Oregon: implications for their conservation in the Pacific states. Biol Conserv 114: 79–90.
    1. Berger-Tal O, Blumstein DT, Swaisgood RR (2020) Conservation translocations: a review of common difficulties and promising directions. Anim Conserv 23: 121–131.
    1. Bleisch AD, Keller BJ, Bonnot TW, Hansen LP, Millspaugh JJ (2017) Initial movements of re-introduced elk in the Missouri Ozarks. Am Midl Nat 178: 1–16.