Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr 13:5:826737.
doi: 10.3389/frai.2022.826737. eCollection 2022.

AI Technologies, Privacy, and Security

Affiliations

AI Technologies, Privacy, and Security

David Elliott et al. Front Artif Intell. .

Abstract

Privacy remains one of the most recurrent concerns that people have about AI technologies. The meaning of the concept of "privacy" has proven to be fairly elusive. Accordingly, the concerns people have about privacy are often vague and ill-formed, which makes it correspondingly difficult to address these concerns, and to explain the ways in which AI technologies do or do not pose threats to people's interests. In this article, we draw attention to some important distinctions that are frequently overlooked, and spell out their implications for concerns about the threats that AI-related technology poses for privacy. We argue that, when people express concerns about privacy in relation to AI technologies, they are usually referring to security interests rather than interests in privacy per se. Nevertheless, we argue that focusing primarily on security interests misses the importance that interests in privacy per se have through their contribution to autonomy and the development of our identities. Improving insight about these issues can make it easier for the developers of AI technologies to provide explanations for users about what interests are and are not at stake through the use of AI systems.

Keywords: artificial intelligence; autonomy; ethics; privacy; security; semantic understanding.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

    1. Aarts E., Wichert R. (2009). “Ambient intelligence,” in Technology Guide: Principles-Applications-Trends, ed H.-J. Bullinger (Munich: Springer; ), 244–249. 10.1007/978-3-540-88546-7_47 - DOI
    1. Brey P. (2005). Freedom and privacy in ambient intelligence. Ethics Inform. Technol. 7, 157–166. 10.1007/s10676-006-0005-3 - DOI
    1. Cohen J. E. (2013). What privacy is for. Harvard Law Rev. 126, 1904–1933. Available online at: https://harvardlawreview.org/2013/05/what-privacy-is-for
    1. Doyle T. (2009). Privacy and perfect voyeurism. Ethics Inform. Technol. 11, 181–189. 10.1007/s10676-009-9195-9 - DOI
    1. Dunbar R. I. M. (2004). Gossip in evolutionary perspective. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 8, 100–110. 10.1037/1089-2680.8.2.100 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources