Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr 14:12:850905.
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.850905. eCollection 2022.

Radioisotope-Guided Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Penile Cancer: A Long-Term Follow-Up Study

Affiliations

Radioisotope-Guided Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Penile Cancer: A Long-Term Follow-Up Study

Lena Nemitz et al. Front Oncol. .

Abstract

Lymph node (LN) management is critical for survival in patients with penile cancer. However, radical inguinal lymphadenectomy carries a high risk of postoperative complications such as lymphedema, lymphocele, wound infection, and skin necrosis. The European Association of Urology guidelines therefore recommend invasive LN staging by modified inguinal lymphadenectomy or dynamic sentinel node biopsy (DSNB) in clinically node-negative patients (cN0) with intermediate- and high-risk tumors (≥ T1G2). However, the timing of DSNB (simultaneous vs. subsequent to partial or total penile resection) is controversial and the low incidence of penile cancer means that data on the long-term outcomes of DSNB are limited. The present study aimed to analyze the reliability and morbidity of DSNB in patients with penile cancer during long-term follow-up. This retrospective study included 41 patients (76 groins) who underwent radioisotope-guided DSNB simultaneously or secondarily after penile surgery from June 2004 to November 2018. In total, 193 sentinel LNs (SLNs) and 39 non-SLNs were removed. The median number of dissected LNs was 2.5 (interquartile range 2-4). Histopathological analysis showed that five of the 76 groins (6.6%) contained metastases. None of the non-SLNs were tumor-positive. In accordance with the guidelines, all inguinal regions with positive SLNs underwent secondary radical inguinal lymphadenectomy, which revealed three additional metastases in one groin. Regional LN recurrence was detected in three patients (four groins) during a median follow-up of 70 months, including two patients in whom DSNB had been performed secondarily after repetitive penile tumor resections. DSNB-related complications occurred in 15.8% of groins. Most complications were mild (Clavien-Dindo grade I; 50%) or moderate (II; 25%), and invasive intervention was only required in 3.9% of groins (IIIa: n = 1; IIIb: n = 2). In summary, this study suggests that the current radioisotope-guided DSNB procedure may reduce the complication rate of inguinal lymphadenectomy in patients with cN0 penile cancer. However, DSNB and penile surgery should be performed simultaneously to minimize the false-negative rate. Recent advances, such as new tracers and imaging techniques, may help to reduce the false-negative rate of DSNB further.

Keywords: dynamic sentinel node biopsy; inguinal lymphadenectomy; lymph node metastases; penile cancer; sentinel lymph node.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of included and excluded patients.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cardona CEM, García-Perdomo HA. Incidence of Penile Cancer Worldwide: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Rev Panam Salud Pública (2017) 41:e117. doi: 10.26633/RPSP.2017.117 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. De Rose AF, Mantica G, Gallo F, Dotta F, Testino N. Risk Factors for the Delay in the Diagnosis of Penile Lesions: Results From a Single Center in Italy. Minerva Urol Nefrol (2019) 71:258–63. doi: 10.23736/S0393-2249.18.03189-2 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Horenblas S, van Tinteren H. Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Penis. IV. Prognostic Factors of Survival: Analysis of Tumor, Nodes and Metastasis Classification System. J Urol (1994) 151:1239–43. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)35221-7 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ficarra V, Akduman B, Bouchot O, Palou J, Tobias-Machado M. Prognostic Factors in Penile Cancer. Urology (2010) 76:S66–73. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.04.008 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wood HM, Angermeier K. Anatomic Considerations of the Penis, Lymphatic Drainage, and Biopsy of the Sentinel Node. Urol Clin North Am (2010) 37:327–34. doi: 10.1016/j.ucl.2010.04.013 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources