Discussion on the Treatment Strategy for Stage ⅡA1 Cervical Cancer (FIGO 2018)
- PMID: 35494051
- PMCID: PMC9046906
- DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.800049
Discussion on the Treatment Strategy for Stage ⅡA1 Cervical Cancer (FIGO 2018)
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to explore the best treatment strategy for International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2018 stage IIA1 cervical cancer patients by comparing the survival outcomes of two treatment methods: abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH) with standard postoperative therapy and radio-chemotherapy (R-CT).
Methods: Patients with FIGO2018 stage IIA1 cervical cancer who underwent ARH or received R-CT were screened from the clinical diagnosis and treatment for cervical cancer in China (Four C) database. The recurrence cases between the two groups were analyzed. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of patients diagnosed with stage IIA1 cervical cancer in 47 hospitals in mainland China between 2004 and 2018 were compared by using propensity score matching (PSM).
Results: A total of 724 patients met the inclusion criteria. In the total study population, The R-CT group had higher recurrence (22.8% for the R-CT group and 11.2% for the ARH group, P<0.001) rates compared to the ARH group.The 5-year OS and DFS of the ARH group (n=658) were significantly higher than those of the R-CT group (n=66) (OS: 85.9% vs. 71.2%, P=0.009; DFS: 79.2%vs. 70.5%, P=0.027). R-CT was associated with worse 5-year OS (HR=3.19, 95% CI: 1.592-6.956, P=0.001) and DFS (HR=2.089, 95% CI: 1.194-3.656, P=0.01). After 1:2 PSM, the 5-year OS and DFS of the ARH group (n=126) were significantly higher than those of the R-CT group (n=64) (OS:88.9% vs. 70.1%, P=0.04; DFS:82.8% vs. 69.8%, P=0.019). R-CT was still associated with worse 5-year OS (HR=2.391, 95% CI: 1.051-5.633, P=0.046) and DFS (HR=2.6, 95% CI: 1.25-5.409, P=0.011).
Conclusion: Our study demonstrated that for stage FIGO2018 stage IIA1 cervical cancer patients, ARH offers better oncological outcomes than R-CT.
Keywords: cervical cancer; disease-free survival; overall survival; stage ⅡA1; treatment strategies.
Copyright © 2022 Chen, Liang, Duan, Wu, Zhan, Dai, Lv, Xie, Liu, Xu, Bin, Lang, Liu and Chen.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Comparison of survival outcomes of abdominal radical hysterectomy and radiochemotherapy IIA2 (FIGO2018) cervical cancer: a retrospective study from a large database of 63,926 cases of cervical cancer in China.Int J Clin Oncol. 2022 Mar;27(3):619-625. doi: 10.1007/s10147-021-02090-9. Epub 2021 Nov 27. Int J Clin Oncol. 2022. PMID: 34837596
-
Survival Outcomes of Patients With Stage IB3 Cervical Cancer Who Undergo Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy Versus Radiochemotherapy.Front Oncol. 2022 Jul 6;12:933755. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.933755. eCollection 2022. Front Oncol. 2022. PMID: 35875125 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative study on the oncological prognosis of laparoscopy and laparotomy for stage IIA1 cervical squamous cell carcinoma.Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021 Feb;47(2):346-352. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.07.016. Epub 2020 Jul 24. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021. PMID: 32859433
-
Survival of patients with early-stage cervical cancer after abdominal or laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: a nationwide cohort study and literature review.Eur J Cancer. 2020 Jul;133:14-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.04.006. Epub 2020 May 15. Eur J Cancer. 2020. PMID: 32422504 Review.
-
Comparison of Minimally Invasive Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: An Updated Meta-Analysis.Front Oncol. 2022 Jan 24;11:762921. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.762921. eCollection 2021. Front Oncol. 2022. PMID: 35141141 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Comparison of Prognosis between Abdominal and Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomies in Early-stage Cervical Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2025 Jul 19;14(3):246-253. doi: 10.4103/gmit.GMIT-D-24-00033. eCollection 2025 Jul-Sep. Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2025. PMID: 40786667 Free PMC article.
-
Current Therapeutic Approaches in Cervical Cancer Based on the Stage of the Disease: Is There Room for Improvement?Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Jun 30;59(7):1229. doi: 10.3390/medicina59071229. Medicina (Kaunas). 2023. PMID: 37512041 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Strategies, Challenges, and Prospects of Nanoparticles in Gynecological Malignancies.ACS Omega. 2024 Aug 23;9(36):37459-37504. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.4c04573. eCollection 2024 Sep 10. ACS Omega. 2024. PMID: 39281920 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Liu P, Lin L, Kong Y, Huo Z, Zhu L, Bin X, et al. . Comparison of Survival Outcomes Between Radio-Chemotherapy and Radical Hysterectomy With Postoperative Standard Therapy in Patients With Stage IB1 to IIA2 Cervical Cancer: Long-Term Oncological Outcome Analysis in 37 Chinese Hospitals. BMC Cancer (2020) 20(1):189. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-6651-8 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous