Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr 14:12:844801.
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.844801. eCollection 2022.

How Immunotherapy Modified the Therapeutic Scenario of Endometrial Cancer: A Systematic Review

Affiliations

How Immunotherapy Modified the Therapeutic Scenario of Endometrial Cancer: A Systematic Review

Brigida Anna Maiorano et al. Front Oncol. .

Abstract

Background: Endometrial cancer (EC) represents the sixth most common female tumor. In the advanced setting, the prognosis is dismal with limited treatment options. Platinum-based chemotherapy represents the actual standard of care in first-line chemotherapy, but no standard second-line chemotherapy is approved, with less than 1/4 of patients responding to second-line chemotherapy. In the last 10 years, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have changed the treatment landscape of many solid tumors.

Methods: The review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. We searched EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane Database, and conference abstracts from international societies, up to November 2021. Clinical trials employing ICIs in advanced EC, written in English, were included. Reviews, letters, and commentaries were excluded. The overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety (number and grade of treatment-related adverse events [TRAEs]) were evaluated.

Results: 15 studies, for a total of 1,627 patients, were included: 14 non-randomized phase I/II trials and 1 randomized phase III trial. Anti-PD1 (pembrolizumab, nivolumab, dostarlimab) and anti-PD-L1 agents (avelumab, atezolizumab, durvalumab) were administered as single agents; pembrolizumab and nivolumab were combined with the tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKI) lenvatinib and cabozantinib, respectively; and durvalumab was associated with anti-CTLA4 tremelimumab. 4 studies selected only MSI patients. Single agents determined an ORR from 26.7% to 58% among MSI patients, from 3% to 26.7% among MSS patients. DCR ranged from 53.5% to 88.9% in MSI, 31.4% to 35.2% in MSS patients. The combination of TKI and ICIs determined 32% to 63.6% of ORR in all-comers, 32%-36.2% in MSS patients. 54.2% to 76% of patients developed TRAEs. The combination of ICIs and TKI achieved a higher toxicity rate than single agents (≥G3 TRAEs 88.9%).

Conclusion: ICIs represent an effective option for pretreated advanced EC patients with a tolerable profile. Given the encouraging results in MSI patients, every woman diagnosed with EC should be investigated for MS status. In MSS women, the combination of ICIs and TKI is more effective than monotherapy, notwithstanding safety concerns. PD-L1 cannot predict ICI response, whereas other biomarkers such as MSI and tumor mutational burden seem more accurate. Ongoing randomized trials will further clarify the role of these therapeutic options.

Systematic review registration: PROSPERO, CRD42021293538.

Keywords: PD1; dostarlimab; endometrial cancer (EC); immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI); immunotherapy; lenvatinib; microsatellite instability (MSI); pembrolizumab.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flowchart for study selection of the systematic review.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Responses and response rates of the included studies. Overall response rate (ORR) ranged from 3% to 58%. ORR to single agents ranged from 26.7% to 58% for MSI patients, 3% to 26.7% for MSS patients (studies that selected MSI and MSS patients are indicated in the figure). In the combination ICIs-TKI studies (“combo” in the figure), ORR was 32% to 52%, reaching 36.2% in MSS patients, 63.6% in MSI patients. DCR ranged from 26.1% to 95.6% in all studies, with peaks in MSI patients (around 90% as single agents or combinations) and MSS patients in case of combination (84%). Objective tumor response rate (OTRR—marked with *) to the combo durvalumab plus tremelimumab was 11.1%. Types of responses recorded in the studies were: 35% progressive disease (PD), 27% partial response (PR), 26% stable disease (SD), 7% complete response (CR).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of the included studies. 11 studies reported mPFS, which ranged from 1.7 to 18.9 months. Among MSI patients treated with ICI monotherapy, mPFS was 8.1 months (5.6–13.1 mos). With combination ICIs-TKI, mPFS ranged from 7.2 to 18.9 mos (among the 11 MSI patients of Keynote-146), ranging from 6.6 to 7.4 months for MSS patients. mOS was available for 5 studies, ranging from 9.6 to 18.3 mos (MSI, MSS groups and combination—”combo” studies are indicated.

References

    1. GLOBOCAN . Uterus (2020). Available at: https://gco.iarc.fr/today/data/factsheets/cancers/24-Corpus-uteri-fact-s... (Accessed 1 December 2021).
    1. SEER . Uterine Cancer. Available at: https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/corp.html (Accessed 1 December 2021).
    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer Statistics, 2021. CA Cancer J Clin (2021) 71(1):7–33. doi: 10.3322/caac.21654 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Esposito K, Chiodini P, Capuano A, Bellastella G, Maiorino MI, Giugliano D. Metabolic Syndrome and Endometrial Cancer: A Meta-Analysis. Endocrine (2014) 45:28–36. doi: 10.1007/s12020-013-9973-3 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Raglan O, Kalliala I, Markozannes G, Cividini S, Gunter MJ, Nautiyal J, et al. Risk Factors for Endometrial Cancer: An Umbrella Review of the Literature. Int J Cancer (2018) 145:1719–30. doi: 10.1002/ijc.31961 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types