Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Nov 16;11(58):36792-36800.
doi: 10.1039/d1ra06277h. eCollection 2021 Nov 10.

Development of novel, biocompatible, polyester amines for microglia-targeting gene delivery

Affiliations

Development of novel, biocompatible, polyester amines for microglia-targeting gene delivery

Boomin Choi et al. RSC Adv. .

Abstract

Recent progress in personalized medicine and gene delivery has created exciting opportunities in therapeutics for central nervous system (CNS) disorders. Despite the interest in gene-based therapies, successful delivery of nucleic acids for treatment of CNS disorders faces major challenges. Here we report the facile synthesis of a novel, biodegradable, microglia-targeting polyester amine (PEA) carrier based on hydrophilic triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TG) and low-molecular weight polyethylenimine (LMW-PEI). This nanocarrier, TG-branched PEI (TGP), successfully condensed double-stranded DNA into a size smaller than 200 nm. TGP nanoplexes were nontoxic in primary mixed glial cells and showed elevated transfection efficiency compared with PEI-25K and lipofector-EZ. After intrathecal and intracranial administration, PEA nanoplexes delivered genes specifically to microglia in the spinal cord and brain, respectively, proposing TGP as a novel microglia-specific gene delivery nanocarrier. The microglia-specific targeting of the TGP nanocarrier offers a new therapeutic strategy to modulate CNS disorders involving aberrant microglia activation while minimizing off-target side effects.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Scheme 1
Scheme 1. Schematic illustration of microglia-targeting TGP/DNA nanoplexes. Novel TGP/DNA nanoplexes can be uptaken specifically by microglia, demonstrating their potential as a therapeutic nanocarrier of DNA or siRNA for CNS diseases.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Schematic illustration of TGP synthesis.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Physicochemical characterization of TGP nanoplexes. (A) and (B) Size and zeta-potential of TGP/pGL3 were analyzed using DLS at N/P ratios of 5, 10, 20, and 30. (C) TEM image showing the morphology of TGP/pGL3 nanoplexes stained with 2% aqueous uranyl acetate (scale bar: 200 nm). (D) Gel retardation assay of TGP/pGL3 nanoplexes prepared at various N/P ratios from 5 to 30.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Effects on cell viability and transfection efficiency of TGP/pGL3 in primary mixed glia. (A) Cell viability was determined after incubation with TGP/pGL3 at N/P ratios from 5 to 30 for 24 h by MTS assay. PEI-25K/pGL3 was used as a control. (B) Transfection efficiency of the TGP/pGL3 nanoplex in primary mixed glia was evaluated by luciferase assay. Cells were transfected with TG/pGL3 with N/P ratios of 5, 10, 20, and 30; after 24 h, luciferase activity was measured. (C) Effect of bafilomycin A1 on the proton sponge effect of TGP/pGL3 and PEI/pGL3 nanoplexes. (n = 3, error bar represents standard deviation; *p <0.1, **p <0.05, ***p <0.01, one-way ANOVA compared to that of PEI/pGL3 nanoplexes and control (NT)).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Uptake kinetics and DNA delivery of TGP in primary pure microglia. Primary pure microglial cells were transfected with Alexa488-TGP/pGL3 or TGP/Alexa546-pGL3 nanoplexes. After 5 and 24 h of transfection, live cells were stained with Hoechst (blue).
Fig. 5
Fig. 5. Uptake kinetics and efficiency of Alexa488-TGP in primary mixed glia. (A) Primary mixed glial cells were transfected with 0.5 μg of Alexa488-TGP/pGL3. After 5 and 24 h of transfection, cells were immunostained for Iba-1 or GFAP. (B) Primary glial cells (5 × 105 cells per well in 6-well plate) were transfected with 0.5 μg of Alexa488-TGP/pGL3, stained with APC-conjugated anti-CD11b and PE-conjugated anti-ACSA-2, and analyzed with a flow cytometer (n = 3 per each group). Representative data (mean ± SEM) are shown (*p <0.05, **p <0.01, ***p <0.001).
Fig. 6
Fig. 6. Spinal cord regional delivery of Alexa488-TGP/pGL3. Mice received 0.1 μg of Alexa488-TGP/pGL3 by i.t. injection. (A) After one day, lumbar 4–6 spinal cord sections were stained with Iba-1, GFAP, and MAP-2 antibodies. Alexa488 signals were detected in Iba-1 positive cells (arrows). (B) After 24 h of Alexa488-TGP/pGL3 i.t. injection, cells of four regions of the spinal cord were isolated. Cells were stained with APC-conjugated anti-CD11b, PE-conjugated anti-ACSA-2, and anti-Thy-1.2 antibodies and analyzed using flow cytometry. (C) Representative histogram. Alexa488 signals were detected by flow cytometry and Alexa488-positive cells were gated. (D) Quantification graphs of Alexa488-positive cell population and mean fluorescence intensity. Representative data (mean ± SEM) are shown (**p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001).
Fig. 7
Fig. 7. Brain microglia-specific delivery of Alexa488-TGP/pGL3. 0.1 μg of Alexa488-TGP/pGL3 was injected intracranially into the hippocampus (coordination ML −1.5 mm, AP +2.18 mm, DV +1.76 mm). (A) Brain slices were stained with Iba-1, GFAP, and NeuN antibodies. Alexa488 signals were detected in Iba-1-positive cells. Scale bar 50 μm. (B) 24 h after Alexa488-TGP/pGL3 nanoplex administration, intact hippocampus cells were isolated and stained with APC-conjugated anti-CD11b, PE-conjugated anti-ACSA-2, and anti-Thy-1.2 antibodies and analyzed using flow cytometry. The Alexa488-positive population was gated for each cell type. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 3 per each group, *p <0.05).

References

    1. Schafer D. P. Lehrman E. K. Kautzman A. G. Koyama R. Mardinly A. R. Yamasaki R. Ransohoff R. M. Greenberg M. E. Barres B. A. Stevens B. Neuron. 2012;74:691–705. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.03.026. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mosher K. I. Wyss-Coray T. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2014;88:594–604. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2014.01.008. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hanisch U. K. Kettenmann H. Nat. Neurosci. 2007;10:1387–1394. doi: 10.1038/nn1997. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wang S. Colonna M. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2019;106:219–227. doi: 10.1002/JLB.3RU1018-378RR. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Qin L. Wu X. Block M. L. Liu Y. Breese G. R. Hong J. S. Knapp D. J. Crews F. T. Glia. 2007;55:453–462. doi: 10.1002/glia.20467. - DOI - PMC - PubMed