Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr 26;11(4):e1385.
doi: 10.1002/cti2.1385. eCollection 2022.

Validation and performance of a multiplex serology assay to quantify antibody responses following SARS-CoV-2 infection or vaccination

Affiliations

Validation and performance of a multiplex serology assay to quantify antibody responses following SARS-CoV-2 infection or vaccination

Deidre Wilkins et al. Clin Transl Immunology. .

Abstract

Objectives: Robust, quantitative serology assays are required to accurately measure antibody levels following vaccination and natural infection. We present validation of a quantitative, multiplex, SARS-CoV-2, electrochemiluminescent (ECL) serology assay; show correlation with two established SARS-CoV-2 immunoassays; and present calibration results for two SARS-CoV-2 reference standards.

Methods: Precision, dilutional linearity, ruggedness, analytical sensitivity and specificity were evaluated. Clinical sensitivity and specificity were assessed using serum from prepandemic and SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-positive patient samples. Assay concordance to the established Roche Elecsys® Anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoassay and a live-virus microneutralisation (MN) assay was evaluated.

Results: Standard curves demonstrated the assay can quantify SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels over a broad range. Assay precision (10.2-15.1% variability), dilutional linearity (≤ 1.16-fold bias per 10-fold increase in dilution), ruggedness (0.89-1.18 overall fold difference), relative accuracy (107-118%) and robust selectivity (102-104%) were demonstrated. Analytical sensitivity was 7, 13 and 7 arbitrary units mL-1 for SARS-CoV-2 spike (S), receptor-binding domain (RBD) and nucleocapsid (N) antigens, respectively. For all antigens, analytical specificity was > 90% and clinical specificity was 99.0%. Clinical sensitivities for S, RBD and N antigens were 100%, 98.8% and 84.9%, respectively. Comparison with the Elecsys® immunoassay showed ≥ 87.7% agreement and linear correlation (Pearson r of 0.85, P < 0.0001) relative to the MN assay. Conversion factors for the WHO International Standard and Meso Scale Discovery® Reference Standard are presented.

Conclusions: The multiplex SARS-CoV-2 ECL serology assay is suitable for efficient, reproducible measurement of antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 antigens in human sera, supporting its use in clinical trials and sero-epidemiology studies.

Keywords: COVID‐19; SARS‐CoV‐2; antibodies; electrochemiluminescence; immunoassay; serology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

DW, AAA, AR, KMT, MTE and EJK are employees of AstraZeneca and may hold stock or stock options. TG, RG, BF and CJBare employees of PPD® Laboratories and may hold stock or stock options.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Standard curve precision profiles for SARS‐CoV‐2‐specific S, RBD and N antibodies 11‐point dilution series tested 45 times. AU, arbitrary units; LOQ, limit of quantitation; N, nucleocapsid protein; RBD, receptor‐binding domain; RLU, relative light unit; S, spike protein; SARS‐CoV‐2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Analytical specificity (a) and sensitivity (b) of the multiplex SARS‐CoV‐2 ECL serology assay to measure antibodies to heterologous and homologous antigens. ECL, electrochemiluminescence; H3, H3 Hong Kong influenza hemagglutinin; N, nucleocapsid protein; OC43, seasonal coronavirus OC43 spike protein; RBD, receptor‐binding domain; S, spike protein; SARS‐CoV‐2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.
Figure 3
Figure 3
SARS‐CoV‐2 S, RBD and N antibody distribution by serostatus cut points (dashed lines) in samples from donors according to known SARS‐CoV‐2 status (a) and number of PCR‐positive samples that were seronegative versus seropositive for both S and N (b) One measurement failed run validity criteria. In a, GMT values for each group are shown as solid‐coloured lines. In b, RBD versus N distribution is the same as S versus N and is not shown. AU, arbitrary units; ECL, electrochemiluminescence; GMT, geometric mean titre; N, nucleocapsid protein; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; RBD, receptor‐binding domain; S, spike protein; SARS‐CoV‐2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.
Figure 4
Figure 4
SARS‐CoV‐2 S, RBD and N antibody distribution by serostatus cut points (dashed lines) in samples from donors with known Roche Elecsys® Anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 immunoassay results (a) and distribution of S versus N antibody concentrations as measured by the multiplex SARS‐CoV‐2 ECL serology assay (b). In a, GMT values for each group are shown as solid‐coloured lines. In b, RBD versus N distribution is the same as S versus N and is not shown. AU, arbitrary units; ECL, electrochemiluminescence; GMT, geometric mean titre; N, nucleocapsid protein; RBD, receptor‐binding domain; S, spike protein; SARS‐CoV‐2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Correlation between the multiplex SARS‐CoV‐2 ECL serology assay (S assay) and the BBRC SARS‐CoV‐2 live‐virus MN assay. A total of 57 samples were tested in three assays. Horizontal dotted line indicates the multiplex SARS‐CoV‐2 ECL serology S assay cut point (675 AU mL−1). Vertical dotted line indicates BBRC MN assay LLOQ (IC50 = 20). Colour shows Roche Elecsys® Anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 immunoassay results. AU, arbitrary units; BBRC, Battelle Biomedical Research Center; CI, confidence interval; ECL, electrochemiluminescence; IC50, half maximal inhibitory concentration; LLOQ, lower limit of quantitation; MN, microneutralisation; S, spike protein; SARS‐CoV‐2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Chan JF, Kok KH, Zhu Z et al. Genomic characterization of the 2019 novel human‐pathogenic coronavirus isolated from a patient with atypical pneumonia after visiting Wuhan. Emerg Microbes Infect 2020; 9: 221–236. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zhou P, Yang XL, Wang XG et al. A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin. Nature 2020; 579: 270–273. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Phan T. Novel coronavirus: from discovery to clinical diagnostics. Infect Genet Evol 2020; 79: 104211. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cheng MP, Papenburg J, Desjardins M et al. Diagnostic testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome‐related coronavirus 2: a narrative review. Ann Intern Med 2020; 172: 726–734. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Huang Y, Yang C, Xu XF, Xu W, Liu SW. Structural and functional properties of SARS‐CoV‐2 spike protein: potential antivirus drug development for COVID‐19. Acta Pharmacol Sin 2020; 41: 1141–1149. - PMC - PubMed