COVID-19 and Pro-environmental Behaviour at Destinations Amongst International Travellers
- PMID: 35496140
- PMCID: PMC9047711
- DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.879300
COVID-19 and Pro-environmental Behaviour at Destinations Amongst International Travellers
Abstract
This paper investigates the COVID-19 pandemic, and its impact on pro-environmental behaviour of individuals travelling internationally for leisure and recreational purposes. The aim of this manuscript is to investigate a conceptual framework created through the examination of current existing literature in the field of tourism science. The conceptual framework, consisting of certain constructs of the health belief model (HBM), and the theory of planned behaviour (TPB), is applied and tested using a partial least-squares-structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM). Data were collected from participants who have travelled internationally before and during the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, and those who plan to travel post-COVID-19 pandemic. Results revealed that the conceptual framework tested positively against existing theory, highlighting the key influencing factors in which COVID-19 is likely to have on future pro-environmental behaviour of individuals travelling internationally for leisure and recreational purposes. Moreover, perceived safety threat and outcome expectations have a positive impact on attitude; attitude has a positive impact on behavioural intentions; subjective norm has a positive impact on behavioural intentions, and perceived behavioural control has a positive impact on behavioural intentions. The study results identify practical and theoretical implications for global and travel companies and organisations, presenting opportunities to adjust environmental policies and procedures accordingly, whilst identifying the most effective marketing and management strategies to rebuild a collapsed global travel industry.
Keywords: COVID-19; health belief model (HBM); international travellers; pro-environmental behaviour; theory of planned behaviour (TPB).
Copyright © 2022 Calder, Radic, Ryu, Ariza-Montes and Han.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Predicting intentions to get the COVID-19 vaccine in India: An integration of theory of planned behaviour and health belief model.Int J Health Plann Manage. 2023 Jan;38(1):214-238. doi: 10.1002/hpm.3582. Epub 2022 Sep 27. Int J Health Plann Manage. 2023. PMID: 36164891 Free PMC article.
-
The Post-Coronavirus World in the International Tourism Industry: Application of the Theory of Planned Behavior to Safer Destination Choices in the Case of US Outbound Tourism.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 6;17(18):6485. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17186485. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020. PMID: 32899942 Free PMC article.
-
A combined theory-based explanatory model for predicting tourists' travel intentions during the COVID-19 pandemic: the role of individual's assessment of the compliance with non-pharmaceutical interventions.Discov Psychol. 2022;2(1):36. doi: 10.1007/s44202-022-00046-2. Epub 2022 Sep 20. Discov Psychol. 2022. PMID: 40477725 Free PMC article.
-
The Validity of the Theory of Planned Behaviour for Understanding People's Beliefs and Intentions toward Reusing Medicines.Pharmacy (Basel). 2021 Mar 9;9(1):58. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy9010058. Pharmacy (Basel). 2021. PMID: 33803406 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Travel-related control measures to contain the COVID-19 pandemic: a rapid review.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 5;10:CD013717. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013717. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 25;3:CD013717. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013717.pub2. PMID: 33502002 Updated.
References
-
- Abcarian R. (2020). Don’t dismiss all vaccine skeptics as anti-science. 20th December 2020. City Edition, 16. Los Angeles: Los Angeles Times.
-
- Ajzen I. (1991). Theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 50 179–211. 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources