Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr 7;23(1):e00289-21.
doi: 10.1128/jmbe.00289-21. eCollection 2022 Apr.

Undergraduates' Experiences with Online and in-Person Courses Provide Opportunities for Improving Student-Centered Biology Laboratory Instruction

Affiliations

Undergraduates' Experiences with Online and in-Person Courses Provide Opportunities for Improving Student-Centered Biology Laboratory Instruction

Mark A Sarvary et al. J Microbiol Biol Educ. .

Abstract

Biology laboratory courses with hands-on activities faced many challenges when switched to online instruction during the COVID-19 pandemic. The transition back to in-person instruction presents an opportunity to redesign courses with greater student input. Undergraduates in an ∼350-student laboratory course were surveyed about their preferences for online or in-person instruction of specific laboratory course components. We predicted that students who have taken a virtual laboratory course prefer keeping some of the components online. We also hypothesized that their preferences are affected by their experience with online-only or with both online and in-person instruction. The results showed that students would like to move the laboratory component and group meetings back to in-person instruction, even if they never experienced college-level in-person courses. Also, many components, including the lectures, exams, assignment submission, and office hours are preferred to be held online. Surprisingly, students who have only taken online courses would rather give group presentations in person, while those who experienced both online and in-person instruction were undecided. Group presentations were the only component where the preference of the two groups significantly differed. Self-assessed learning gains showed that students performed very well in both the online semesters and the in-person semesters. Therefore, the preferences measured in this study were likely developed based on students' future expectations and personal gains, and not only on their metacognitive decisions and academic performances. This study provides considerations for redesigning components of laboratory courses to be more student-centered after the pandemic.

Keywords: face-to-face instruction; inquiry-based laboratory; metacognition.; online learning; pandemic pedagogy; student-centered teaching; undergraduates.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

FIG 1
FIG 1
Student preferences regarding keeping course components online (left) or moving back to face-to-face instruction (right). The question categories can be found on the y axis, while percentage of the students choosing either online (OL) or face-to-face (F2F) options is on the X-axis. Statistically significant preference is indicated by an * next to the category name. Sample size (n) and significance level (α = 0.05) are also listed. The exact percentage of the students who preferred each category is listed in the bar plot for each choice. The wording of the categories in the figure is simplified and shortened from the survey.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Versteeg M, Bressers G, Wijnen-Meijer M, Ommering BWC, de Beaufort AJ, Steendijk P. 2021. What were you thinking? Medical students’ metacognition and perceptions of self-regulated learning. Teach Learn Med 33:473–482. doi:10.1080/10401334.2021.1889559. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Roberts JS. 2021. Integrating metacognitive regulation into the online classroom using student-developed learning plans. J Microbiol Biol Educ 22. doi:10.1128/jmbe.v22i1.2409. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tanner KD. 2017. Promoting student metacognition. CBE Life Sciences Education 11:113–120. doi:10.1187/cbe12-03-0033. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stanton JD, Sebesta AJ, Dunlosky J. 2021. Fostering metacognition to support student learning and performance. CBE Life Sciences Education 20. doi:10.1187/cbe.20-12-0289. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gya R, Bjune AE. 2021. Taking practical learning in STEM education home: examples from do-it-yourself experiments in plant biology. Ecol Evol 11:3481–3487. doi:10.1002/ece3.7207. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources