Customers' satisfaction toward drugstore facilities and services based on the good pharmacy practice standard in Thailand
- PMID: 35497907
- PMCID: PMC9014892
- DOI: 10.18549/PharmPract.2022.1.2601
Customers' satisfaction toward drugstore facilities and services based on the good pharmacy practice standard in Thailand
Abstract
Introduction: The Good Pharmacy Practice (GPP) standards in Thailand have been legally implemented for all drugstores since 2014. However, customer satisfaction has not been studied. This research aimed to explore the satisfaction of the customers with the facilities and services received from drugstores under the GPP standards and examine the impact of satisfaction toward each GPP domain on overall satisfaction (OS) and the intention to receive the pharmacy services as the first choice in the case of common and non-serious illnesses (IntR).
Methods: This research was a cross-sectional survey study. The Google Forms for data collection was distributed via the online social media between June and August 2021. The satisfaction toward OS, IntR, and the GPP domains; places and equipment (PE), personnel (P), quality control (QC), and pharmacy services (PS) were collected using 5-Likert scales. Descriptive statistics, intra-class correlation, and multiple regression were used in data analysis with statistical significance at p-value<0.05.
Results: Three hundred and eighty-eight drugstore's customers responded to the questionnaires. Most customers rated the OS and the IntR at the highest level. The mean of the OS was 4.4±0.7 and the IntR was 4.6±0.7 points out of five. The OS and the IntR were highly correlated with the ICC of 0.719 (p-value<0.001). The satisfactions toward each GPP criteria were ranged between 3.9±0.9 to 4.6±0.7 indicating high levels of satisfaction. All 4 domains of the GPP standards explained the OS and the IntR with R square at 0.541 and 0.363, respectively. However, only PS and PE impacted the OS and only QC and PS impacted the IntR with statistical significance.
Conclusion: Thai customers had high levels of the OS and the IntR toward drugstore facilities and services based on the GPP standards. The PS was the domain that statistically influenced both the OS and the IntR, whereas the PE and the QC also statistically influenced the OS and the IntR, respectively. Since PE was the most weighted domain for current inspection, PS and QC should be more emphasized in future revision of the GPP inspection.
Keywords: Customer; Drugstore; GPP; Good Pharmacy Practice; Satisfaction.
Copyright: © Pharmacy Practice.
Similar articles
-
Pharmacy Customers' Experiences With Electronic Prescriptions: Cross-Sectional Survey on Nationwide Implementation in Finland.J Med Internet Res. 2018 Feb 23;20(2):e68. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9367. J Med Internet Res. 2018. PMID: 29475826 Free PMC article.
-
What is the impact of service quality on customers' satisfaction during COVID-19 outbreak? New findings from online reviews analysis.Telemat Inform. 2021 Nov;64:101693. doi: 10.1016/j.tele.2021.101693. Epub 2021 Aug 3. Telemat Inform. 2021. PMID: 34887617 Free PMC article.
-
The nexus between quality of customer relationship management systems and customers' satisfaction: Evidence from online customers' reviews.Heliyon. 2023 Nov 4;9(11):e21828. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21828. eCollection 2023 Nov. Heliyon. 2023. PMID: 38034804 Free PMC article.
-
Do customers' perceptions of Islamic banking services predict satisfaction and word of mouth? Evidence from Islamic banks in Bangladesh.PLoS One. 2023 Jan 20;18(1):e0280108. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280108. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 36662905 Free PMC article.
-
Inter-rater reliability and validity of good pharmacy practices measures in inspection of public sector health facility pharmacies in Uganda.J Pharm Policy Pract. 2019 Jan 22;12:2. doi: 10.1186/s40545-018-0161-y. eCollection 2019. J Pharm Policy Pract. 2019. PMID: 30680220 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Adherence to Good Pharmacy Practices by Community Pharmacies in Lebanon and Opportunities for Quality Improvement: It is Time to Act.Integr Pharm Res Pract. 2023 Jan 27;12:25-35. doi: 10.2147/IPRP.S377635. eCollection 2023. Integr Pharm Res Pract. 2023. PMID: 36733974 Free PMC article.
-
Developing a quality framework for community pharmacy: a systematic review of international literature.BMJ Open. 2024 Feb 15;14(2):e079820. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079820. BMJ Open. 2024. PMID: 38365299 Free PMC article.
-
Patient care and customer services during the COVID-19 pandemic at accredited pharmacies: Pharmacists and patients' perspectives.Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2023 Sep 21;12:100336. doi: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2023.100336. eCollection 2023 Dec. Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2023. PMID: 37810746 Free PMC article.
-
Towards Better CARE for Superficial Fungal Infections: A Consultation Guide for the Community Pharmacy.Pharmacy (Basel). 2022 Feb 11;10(1):29. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy10010029. Pharmacy (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35202078 Free PMC article.
-
Understanding public perception of health examination services: Key factors influencing satisfaction in Türkiye.PLoS One. 2025 May 29;20(5):e0324125. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324125. eCollection 2025. PLoS One. 2025. PMID: 40440609 Free PMC article.
References
-
- World Health Organization. Annex 8:Joint FIP/WHO guidelines on good pharmacy practice:standards for quality of pharmacy services. [Accessed November 12, 2021];WHO expert committee on specifications for pharmaceutical preparations. Published 2011.
-
- Office of Community Pharmacy Accreditation. History of the community pharmacy accreditation program. [Accessed November 12, 2021];The pharmacy council of Thailand. Published 2020.
-
- Wuttipanich T, Kitisopee T. Economic impact assessment on good pharmacy practice regulation in Thai community pharmacy. Thai J Pharm Sci. 2015;39(3):110–118.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources