Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Apr 12:9:850700.
doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.850700. eCollection 2022.

State-of-the-Art Review: Technical and Imaging Considerations in Novel Transapical and Port-Access Mitral Valve Chordal Repair for Degenerative Mitral Regurgitation

Romy M J J Hegeman  1 , Livia L Gheorghe  2 , Thomas L de Kroon  1 , Bart P van Putte  1 , Martin J Swaans  3 , Patrick Klein  1
Affiliations
Review

State-of-the-Art Review: Technical and Imaging Considerations in Novel Transapical and Port-Access Mitral Valve Chordal Repair for Degenerative Mitral Regurgitation

Romy M J J Hegeman et al. Front Cardiovasc Med. .

Abstract

Degenerative mitral regurgitation (DMR) based on posterior leaflet prolapse is the most frequent type of organic mitral valve disease and has proven to be durably repairable in most cases by chordal repair techniques either by conventional median sternotomy or by less invasive approaches both utilizing extracorporeal circulation and cardioplegic myocardial arrest. Recently, several novel transapical chordal repair techniques specifically targeting the posterior leaflet have been developed as a far less invasive and beating heart (off-pump) alternative to port-access mitral repair. In order to perform a safe and effective minimally invasive mitral chordal repair, thorough knowledge of the anatomy of the mitral valve apparatus and adequate use of multimodality imaging both pre- and intraoperatively are fundamental. In addition, comprehensive understanding of the available novel devices, their delivery systems and the individual procedural steps are required.

Keywords: Beating Heart Mitral Valve Repair; Harpoon; chord implantation; minimally invasive MV repair; minimally invasive mitral valve surgery; mitral valve repair; mitral valve surgery; transapical.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
The set-up for a minimally invasive port-access approach through a right anterolateral thoracotomy, as performed in the Sint Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein. The patient is positioned in a 30* left lateral position with the right arm placed posteriorly, with a sand bag under de right scapula. A soft tissue retractor is used without additional rib spreading. Depicted are the atrial roof retractor, camera port and aortic cross-clamp (from medial to right lateral).
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Intraoperative long-axis TEE view showing part of the left atrium, the left ventricle and the left ventricular outflow tract, before repair with the HARPOON device. The measurement of the tissue/gap-ratio is demonstrated. Tissue-length (red), 2.1 cm; gap-length (blue), 0.97 cm. Tissue/gap-ratio = 2.1/0.97 = 2.2.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Intraoperative long-axis TEE view showing part of the left atrium, the left ventricle and the left ventricular outflow tract, before repair with the HARPOON device. The measurement of the tissue/gap-ratio is demonstrated. Tissue-length, 1.98 cm; gap-length, 1.14 cm. Tissue/gap-ratio = 1.98/1.14 = 1.74. The anteroposterior diameter is 3.76 cm.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
The set-up for Harpoon Beating Heart Mitral Valve Repair through a left anterolateral thoracotomy, as performed in the Sint Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein. The left shoulder and elbow are slightly flexed dorsally. A soft tissue retractor is used without additional rib spreading. Four pericardial stay sutures are placed. The hemostatic introducer is inserted and secured with two concentric purse-string sutures.
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
The end effector is used to stabilize the HARPOON device on the underside of the pMVL at the targeted implantation site. pMVL, posterior mitral valve leaflet.
FIGURE 6
FIGURE 6
Intraoperative three-dimensional TrueVue photo-realistic rendering of the mitral valve before repair with the HARPOON System. A surgical view of the atrial side of the mitral valve is shown on the right. The anteroposterior diameter of the mitral valve is 3.96 cm.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Wu S, Chai A, Arimie S, Mehra A, Clavijo L, Matthews RV, et al. Incidence and treatment of severe primary mitral regurgitation in contemporary clinical practice. Cardiovasc Revascularization Med. (2018) 19:960–3. 10.1016/j.carrev.2018.07.021 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vahanian A, Beyersdorf F, Praz F, Milojevic M, Baldus S, Bauersachs J, et al. 2021 ESC/EACTS guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Eur J Cardio-Thoracic Surg. (2021) 60:727–800. 10.1093/ejcts/ezab389 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zamorano JL, Manuel Monteagudo J, Mesa D, Gonzalez-Alujas T, Sitges M, Carrasco-Chinchilla F, et al. Frequency, mechanism and severity of mitral regurgitation: are there any differences between primary and secondary mitral regurgitation? J Heart Valve Dis. (2016) 25:724–9. - PubMed
    1. Pojar M, Karalko M, Dergel M, Vojacek J. Minimally invasive or sternotomy approach in mitral valve surgery: a propensity-matched comparison. J Cardiothorac Surg. (2021) 16:228. 10.1186/s13019-021-01578-9 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ryan WH, Brinkman WT, Dewey TM, Mack MJ, Prince SL, Herbert MA. Mitral valve surgery: comparison of outcomes in matched sternotomy and port access groups. J Heart Valve Dis. (2010) 19:51–8; discussion 59. - PubMed