Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Dec;56(6):1901-1909.
doi: 10.1002/jmri.28219. Epub 2022 May 2.

Quantitative Apparent Diffusion Coefficients From Peritumoral Regions as Early Predictors of Response to Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Affiliations

Quantitative Apparent Diffusion Coefficients From Peritumoral Regions as Early Predictors of Response to Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Benjamin C Musall et al. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2022 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST) in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a strong predictor of patient survival. Edema in the peritumoral region (PTR) has been reported to be a negative prognostic factor in TNBC.

Purpose: To determine whether quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) features from PTRs on reduced field-of-view (rFOV) diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) predict the response to NAST in TNBC.

Study type: Prospective.

Population/subjects: A total of 108 patients with biopsy-proven TNBC who underwent NAST and definitive surgery during 2015-2020.

Field strength/sequence: A 3.0 T/rFOV single-shot diffusion-weighted echo-planar imaging sequence (DWI).

Assessment: Three scans were acquired longitudinally (pretreatment, after two cycles of NAST, and after four cycles of NAST). For each scan, 11 ADC histogram features (minimum, maximum, mean, median, standard deviation, kurtosis, skewness and 10th, 25th, 75th, and 90th percentiles) were extracted from tumors and from PTRs of 5 mm, 10 mm, 15 mm, and 20 mm in thickness with inclusion and exclusion of fat-dominant pixels.

Statistical tests: ADC features were tested for prediction of pCR, both individually using Mann-Whitney U test and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and in combination in multivariable models with k-fold cross-validation. A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: Fifty-one patients (47%) had pCR. Maximum ADC from PTR, measured after two and four cycles of NAST, was significantly higher in pCR patients (2.8 ± 0.69 vs 3.5 ± 0.94 mm2 /sec). The top-performing feature for prediction of pCR was the maximum ADC from the 5-mm fat-inclusive PTR after cycle 4 of NAST (AUC: 0.74; 95% confidence interval: 0.64, 0.84). Multivariable models of ADC features performed similarly for fat-inclusive and fat-exclusive PTRs, with AUCs ranging from 0.68 to 0.72 for the cycle 2 and cycle 4 scans.

Data conclusion: Quantitative ADC features from PTRs may serve as early predictors of the response to NAST in TNBC.

Evidence level: 1 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 4.

Keywords: apparent diffusion coefficient; neoadjuvant therapy; peritumoral edema; prediction of treatment response; quantitative MRI; triple negative breast cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Peritumoral region segmentation in a 48-year-old woman with triple-negative breast cancer of the right breast. A, ADC map showing known 4.8 cm cancer at 9 o’clock position 8 cm from the nipple (red arrow). B, ADC maps with fat-inclusive peritumoral regions. C, ADC maps with fat-exclusive peritumoral regions. The solid red lines in B and C show the tumor boundary; the outer lines show boundaries of different peritumoral region thicknesses: solid yellow line – 20 mm, the inner dashed orange line – 15 mm, dashed red line – 10 mm, and dashed maroon line - 5 mm.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Dot plots and Mann Whitney p-values of the 4 volume-independent peritumoral region (PTR) apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) features compared using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) between patients with a pathologic complete response (pCR) and without a pCR (“non-pCR”) for both the training and testing sets. A, Cycle 4 fat-inclusive 5-mm ADC standard deviation (SD). B, Cycle 4 fat-inclusive 10-mm ADC SD. C, Cycle 4 fat-inclusive 15-mm ADC SD. D, Cycle 4 fat-inclusive 20-mm ADC SD.

Comment in

References

    1. Dent R, Trudeau M, Pritchard KI, et al. Triple-negative breast cancer: clinical features and patterns of recurrence. Clin Cancer Res 2007;13(15):4429–4434. - PubMed
    1. Oakman C, Viale G, Di Leo A. Management of triple negative breast cancer. Breast 2010;19(5):312–321. - PubMed
    1. Anders C, Carey LA. Understanding and treating triple-negative breast cancer. Oncology 2008;22(11):1233–1239. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bauer KR, Brown M, Cress RD, Parise CA, Caggiano V. Descriptive analysis of estrogen receptor (ER)-negative, progesterone receptor (PR)-negative, and HER2-negative invasive breast cancer, the so-called triple-negative phenotype: a population-based study from the California Cancer Registry. Cancer 2007;109(9):1721–1728. - PubMed
    1. von Minckwitz G, Untch M, Blohmer JU, et al. Definition and impact of pathologic complete response on prognosis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in various intrinsic breast cancer subtypes. J Clin Oncol 2012;30(15):1796–1804. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources