Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Jan;31(1):40-49.
doi: 10.1007/s00167-022-06933-4. Epub 2022 Apr 30.

Diagnosing Hip Microinstability: an international consensus study using the Delphi methodology

Collaborators, Affiliations
Review

Diagnosing Hip Microinstability: an international consensus study using the Delphi methodology

Vikas Khanduja et al. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Jan.

Abstract

Purpose: Hip microinstability is a relatively new diagnosis which is increasingly being discussed in the literature and yet there are no clear guidelines for making a diagnosis. Microinstability has generally been defined as persistent excessive hip motion that has become symptomatic especially with pain. This aim of this Delphi study was to seek expert opinion to formulate a diagnostic criteria for hip microinstability.

Methods: A Delphi methodology was used for this consensus study. A literature search was conducted on PubMed up to March 2019 using the keywords ((hip) and (microinstability)) to identify relevant articles on this topic. All relevant criteria used for diagnosing hip microinstability were collated to create a questionnaire and further criterion suggested by the experts were included as well. Four rounds of questionnaires were delivered via an online survey platform. Between each round the authors acted as administrating intermediaries, providing the experts with a summary of results and synthesising the next questionnaire. The expert panel was comprised of 27 members: 24 (89%) orthopaedic surgeons and 3 (11%) physiotherapists from around the world.

Results: Expert panel participation in rounds 1-4 was: 27 (100%), 20 (74%), 21 (78%) and 26 (96%) respectively. A literature review by the authors identified 32 diagnostic criteria to populate the first questionnaire. Experts suggested amending three criteria and creating five new criteria. The panel converged on ranking 3 (8%) of criteria as "Not important", 20 (54%) as "Minor Factors" and 14 (38%) as "Major Factors". No criteria was ranked as "Essential". Criteria were subcategorised into patient history, examination and imaging. Experts voted for a minimum requirement of four criteria in each subcategory, including at least six "Major factors". The final diagnostic tool was approved by 20 (77%) of the final round panel.

Conclusion: This study describes the first known expert consensus on diagnosing hip microinstability. The relative complexity of the final diagnostic tool is illustrative of the difficulty clinicians' face when making this diagnosis.

Level of evidence: V.

Keywords: Consensus; Delphi; Dysplasia; Hip pain; Microinstability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

ND: nothing to disclose. VK: educational consultant for Smith & Nephew and Arthrex, Chair - ESSKA Hip Arthroscopy Committee, President - British Hip Society. NB: reports personal fees from Dedeinne Sante, Stryker and CONMED outside of submitted work. JO’D: nothing to disclose. MS: nothing to disclose.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Consensus methodology steps

References

    1. Akins RB, Tolson H, Cole BR. Stability of response characteristics of a Delphi panel: application of bootstrap data expansion. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005;5:37. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-5-37. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Audigé L, Flury M, Müller AM, Durchholz H. Complications associated with arthroscopic rotator cuff tear repair: definition of a core event set by Delphi consensus process. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016;25(12):1907–1917. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.04.036. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Avella J. Delphi panels: research design, procedures, advantages, and challenges. Int J Dr Stud. 2016;11:305–321.
    1. Ayeni OR, Larson CM, Bonin N, Safran MR. Editorial: is the hip really a stable joint? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017;25(1):1–2. doi: 10.1007/s00167-016-4293-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bellabarba C, Sheinkop MB, Kuo KN. Idiopathic hip instability. An unrecognized cause of coxa saltans in the adult. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;355:261–271.5. doi: 10.1097/00003086-199810000-00028. - DOI - PubMed