Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May 2;13(1):2381.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-30037-9.

Limits to reproduction and seed size-number trade-offs that shape forest dominance and future recovery

Tong Qiu  1 Robert Andrus  2 Marie-Claire Aravena  3 Davide Ascoli  4 Yves Bergeron  5 Roberta Berretti  4 Daniel Berveiller  6 Michal Bogdziewicz  7 Thomas Boivin  8 Raul Bonal  9 Don C Bragg  10 Thomas Caignard  11 Rafael Calama  12 J Julio Camarero  13 Chia-Hao Chang-Yang  14 Natalie L Cleavitt  15 Benoit Courbaud  16 Francois Courbet  8 Thomas Curt  17 Adrian J Das  18 Evangelia Daskalakou  19 Hendrik Davi  8 Nicolas Delpierre  6 Sylvain Delzon  11 Michael Dietze  20 Sergio Donoso Calderon  3 Laurent Dormont  21 Josep Espelta  22 Timothy J Fahey  15 William Farfan-Rios  23 Catherine A Gehring  24 Gregory S Gilbert  25 Georg Gratzer  26 Cathryn H Greenberg  27 Qinfeng Guo  28 Andrew Hacket-Pain  29 Arndt Hampe  11 Qingmin Han  30 Janneke Hille Ris Lambers  31 Kazuhiko Hoshizaki  32 Ines Ibanez  33 Jill F Johnstone  34 Valentin Journé  16 Daisuke Kabeya  30 Christopher L Kilner  1 Thomas Kitzberger  35 Johannes M H Knops  36 Richard K Kobe  37 Georges Kunstler  16 Jonathan G A Lageard  38 Jalene M LaMontagne  39 Mateusz Ledwon  40 Francois Lefevre  8 Theodor Leininger  41 Jean-Marc Limousin  42 James A Lutz  43 Diana Macias  44 Eliot J B McIntire  45 Christopher M Moore  46 Emily Moran  47 Renzo Motta  4 Jonathan A Myers  48 Thomas A Nagel  49 Kyotaro Noguchi  50 Jean-Marc Ourcival  42 Robert Parmenter  51 Ian S Pearse  52 Ignacio M Perez-Ramos  53 Lukasz Piechnik  54 John Poulsen  1 Renata Poulton-Kamakura  1 Miranda D Redmond  55 Chantal D Reid  1 Kyle C Rodman  56 Francisco Rodriguez-Sanchez  57 Javier D Sanguinetti  58 C Lane Scher  1 William H Schlesinger  1 Harald Schmidt Van Marle  3 Barbara Seget  54 Shubhi Sharma  1 Miles Silman  59 Michael A Steele  60 Nathan L Stephenson  18 Jacob N Straub  61 I-Fang Sun  62 Samantha Sutton  1 Jennifer J Swenson  1 Margaret Swift  1 Peter A Thomas  63 Maria Uriarte  64 Giorgio Vacchiano  65 Thomas T Veblen  2 Amy V Whipple  24 Thomas G Whitham  24 Andreas P Wion  66 Boyd Wright  67 S Joseph Wright  68 Kai Zhu  25 Jess K Zimmerman  69 Roman Zlotin  70 Magdalena Zywiec  54 James S Clark  71   72
Affiliations

Limits to reproduction and seed size-number trade-offs that shape forest dominance and future recovery

Tong Qiu et al. Nat Commun. .

Abstract

The relationships that control seed production in trees are fundamental to understanding the evolution of forest species and their capacity to recover from increasing losses to drought, fire, and harvest. A synthesis of fecundity data from 714 species worldwide allowed us to examine hypotheses that are central to quantifying reproduction, a foundation for assessing fitness in forest trees. Four major findings emerged. First, seed production is not constrained by a strict trade-off between seed size and numbers. Instead, seed numbers vary over ten orders of magnitude, with species that invest in large seeds producing more seeds than expected from the 1:1 trade-off. Second, gymnosperms have lower seed production than angiosperms, potentially due to their extra investments in protective woody cones. Third, nutrient-demanding species, indicated by high foliar phosphorus concentrations, have low seed production. Finally, sensitivity of individual species to soil fertility varies widely, limiting the response of community seed production to fertility gradients. In combination, these findings can inform models of forest response that need to incorporate reproductive potential.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Seed production quantifies forest regeneration potential.
Regeneration of forests devastated by multi-year drought and fire depend on a vastly diminished seed supply. a Seed production is limited to unburned landscape fragments in the Sierra Nevada mixed conifer zone following 2020 burns at a Masting Inference and Forecasting network (MASTIF) and National Ecological Observatory Network (NEON) site (Shaver Lake, CA). b Total reproduction includes not only seeds, but also defenses, including wood, spines, and resin flow in conifer cones; examples from the heavily burned Sierra Nevada and Coast ranges include Calocedrus decurrens, Pinus albicaulis, P. contorta, P. coulteri, P. flexilis, P. lambertiana, P. monophylla, P. monticola, P. ponderosa, P. radiata, P. sabiniana, Pseudotsuga menzesii, Sequoiadendron giganteum, and Tsuga mertensiana. Mass fractions for seeds to seeds plus cones ranges from 3% for P. radiata, P. contorta, P. coulteri, and P. sabiniana to 61% for C. decurrens. The largest cone in b (Pinus lambertiana) is 46 cm. Photo credits: James S. Clark and Jordan Luongo.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. seed size-number trade-offs and species seed production.
a Species seed production (SSP, g seed per m2 tree basal area) is not constrained by the strict size-number trade-off (dashed line with a slope of zero). Instead, it varies over ten orders of magnitude and has a positive correlation with seed mass across 714 tree species (log10SSP =4.29+0.546log10m, R2 = 0.189, p < 10−15, n = 714). b SSP exhibits phylogenetic coherence for 482 species having phylogeny data (68% of species). Brown and green text highlight species that produce coniferous cones and fleshy fruits, respectively. The phylogenetic signal is estimated using Pagel's λ = 0.60 (p < 10−9, n = 482).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Effects of foliar nutrients on seed production.
Effects of foliar nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) on SSP (g seed per m2 tree basal area) from the model in Supplementary Table 1 plotted for the broadleaf deciduous leaf habit (other leaf types exhibit same patterns). The convex hull for the surface is restricted to the data coverage. Symbols indicate leaf habit, including broadleaf deciduous (BD), broadleaf evergreen (BE), needleleaf evergreen (NE), and scalelike evergreen (SE).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Effects of soil fertility on seed production.
Sensitivity of individual standardized production (ISP) to soil fertility based on within-species response to cation exchange capacity (βcec). Text color follows Fig. 2. Red dashed line indicates the ancestry of gymnosperms. Percentages of species that respond negatively to CEC are labeled for species groups. The analysis includes 141 species that span a sufficient CEC range in the Masting Inference and Forecasting (MASTIF) network to estimate a robust effect. The phylogenetic signal, estimated for 129 species (91% of species) having phylogeny data, is highly significant (Pagel's λ = 0.87, p < 0.001, n = 129).
Fig. 5
Fig. 5. The MASTIF model, summarized from Clark et al., includes three levels, observed responses (above), process, and parameters (part of the posterior distribution, middle), and predictors (below).
The data model for observed responses includes uncertainty that comes from seed dispersal (seed traps), the fraction of the crop that can be observed (crop counts), and detection of mature status. The process model describes change in maturation status ρi,t and, once mature, conditional fecundity ψi,t. Fitted coefficients for conditional fecundity βψ and maturation probability βρ describe how predictor variables in red affect maturation and fecundity. Error in the process model is absorbed by process error variance σ2. Predictors are held in a design matrix xi,t for conditional fecundity. Diameter di,t is the predictor for maturation status. Additional subscripts for location j and species s in the main texts are suppressed to reduce clutter.

References

    1. Curtis PG, Slay CM, Harris NL, Tyukavina A, Hansen MC. Classifying drivers of global forest loss. Science. 2018;361:1108–1111. doi: 10.1126/science.aau3445. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Duane A, Castellnou M, Brotons L. Towards a comprehensive look at global drivers of novel extreme wildfire events. Clim. Change. 2021;165:43. doi: 10.1007/s10584-021-03066-4. - DOI
    1. Allen CD, et al. A global overview of drought and heat-induced tree mortality reveals emerging climate change risks for forests. For. Ecol. Manag. 2010;259:660–684. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.09.001. - DOI
    1. Franklin, J. F., Mitchell, R. J. & Palik, B. J. Natural disturbance and stand development principles for ecological forestry. General Technical Report. NRS-19. Newtown Square, PA: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station. 44. p. 19 (2007).
    1. Westoby M, Jurado E, Leishman M. Comparative evolutionary ecology of seed size. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1992;7:368–372. doi: 10.1016/0169-5347(92)90006-W. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types