Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May 2;12(1):7103.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-11307-4.

Seed priming with selenium and zinc nanoparticles modifies germination, growth, and yield of direct-seeded rice (Oryza sativa L.)

Affiliations

Seed priming with selenium and zinc nanoparticles modifies germination, growth, and yield of direct-seeded rice (Oryza sativa L.)

Saju Adhikary et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Direct-seeded rice (DSR) seeds are often exposed to multiple environmental stresses in the field, leading to poor emergence, growth and productivity. Appropriate seed priming agents may help to overcome these challenges by ensuring uniform seed germination, and better seedling stand establishment. To examine the effectiveness of sodium selenite (Na-selenite), sodium selenate (Na-selenate), zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO-NPs), and their combinations as priming agents for DSR seeds, a controlled pot experiment followed by a field experiment over two consecutive years was conducted on a sandy clay loam soil (Inceptisol) in West Bengal, India. Priming with combinations of all priming agents had advantages over the hydro-priming treatment (control). All the combinations of the three priming agents resulted in the early emergence of seedlings with improved vigour. In the field experiment, all the combinations increased the plant chlorophyll, phenol and protein contents, leaf area index and duration, crop growth rate, uptake of nutrients (N, P, K, B, Zn and Si), and yield of DSR over the control. Our findings suggest that seed priming with the combination of ZnO-NPs, Na-selenite, and Na-selenate could be a viable option for the risk mitigation in DSR.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Leaf area index of direct-seeded rice plants during vegetative (A,D), reproductive (B,E), and ripening (C,F) stages as affected by seed priming treatments in a field experiment in 2019 (AC) and 2020 (DF). Treatments with different letters (top of bars) represent significant differences (P < 0.05) between treatments. Vertical lines with caps are ± standard error of the mean. Treatments details are given in Table 1.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Leaf area duration of direct-seeded rice plants during vegetative (A,D), reproductive (B,E), and ripening (C,F) stages as affected by seed priming in a field experiment in 2019 (AC) and 2020 (DF). Treatment bars with different letters represent significant differences (P < 0.05) between means. Vertical lines with caps are ± standard error of the mean of treatments. Treatments details are given in Table 1.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Crop growth rate of direct-seeded rice during vegetative (A,D), reproductive (B,E), and ripening (C,F) stages as affected by seed priming in a field experiment in 2019 (AC) and 2020 (DF). Treatment bars with different letters represent significant differences (P < 0.05) between means. Vertical lines with caps are ± standard error of the mean of treatments. Treatments details are given in Table 1.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Net biomass assimilation rate by direct-seeded rice plants during vegetative (A,D), reproductive (B,E), and ripening (C,F) stages as affected by seed priming in a field experiment in 2019 (AC) and 2020 (DF). Treatment bars with different letters represent significant differences (P < 0.05) between means. Vertical lines with caps are ± standard error of the mean of treatments. Treatments details are given in Table 1.

References

    1. Yuan S, et al. Sustainable intensification for a larger global rice bowl. Nat. Commun. 2021;12:2. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20340-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yuan S, et al. Southeast Asia must narrow down the yield gap to continue to be a major rice bowl. Nat. Food. 2022;3:217–226. doi: 10.1038/s43016-022-00477-z. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ladha JK, et al. Steady agronomic and genetic interventions are essential for sustaining productivity in intensive rice cropping. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2021;118:e2110807118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2110807118. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kar I, et al. Productivity trade-off with different water regimes and genotypes of rice under non-puddled conditions in Eastern India. F. Crop. Res. 2018;222:218–229. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2017.10.007. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chakraborty D, et al. A global analysis of alternative tillage and crop establishment practices for economically and environmentally efficient rice production. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:1–11. doi: 10.1038/s41598-016-0028-x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types