Impact of conditioning regimen intensity on outcomes of second allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for secondary acute myelogenous leukemia
- PMID: 35501565
- DOI: 10.1038/s41409-022-01693-8
Impact of conditioning regimen intensity on outcomes of second allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for secondary acute myelogenous leukemia
Erratum in
-
Correction to: Impact of conditioning regimen intensity on outcomes of second allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for secondary acute myelogenous leukemia.Bone Marrow Transplant. 2022 Dec;57(12):1854. doi: 10.1038/s41409-022-01834-z. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2022. PMID: 36207624 No abstract available.
Abstract
Limited data is available on factors impacting the outcomes of second hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT2) in patients with secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML). This study aimed to assess HCT2 outcome for sAML comparing reduced-intensity (RIC) to myeloablative (MAC) conditioning. Two hundred and fifteen patients were included: RIC (n = 134), MAC (n = 81). The median follow-up was 41.1 (95% CI: 26.7-69.3) and 28.5 (95% CI: 23.9-75.4) months, respectively. At two years, the relapse incidence (RI) was 58.3% versus 51.1% in RIC and MAC, respectively. The 2-year leukemia free survival (LFS) was 26.6% versus 26%, and the graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS) was 16.4% versus 12.1%, while OS was 31.4% and 39.7%, for RIC and MAC respectively. MVA showed a significantly lower RI [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.46 (95% CI, 0.26-0.8, p = 0.006)] and improved LFS [HR = 0.62 (95% CI, 0.39-0.98, p = 0.042)] with MAC versus RIC. The choice of conditioning regimen did not impact non-relapse mortality [HR = 1.14 (95% CI, 0.52-2.5, p = 0.74)], overall survival (OS) [HR = 0.72 (95% CI, 0.44-1.17, p = 0.18)] or GRFS [HR = 0.89 (95% CI, 0.59-1.36, p = 0.6)]. In conclusion, MAC was associated with a lower RI and superior LFS. These results support the use of MAC for eligible patients with sAML who are being considered for HCT2.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.
References
-
- Granfeldt Ostgard LS, Medeiros BC, Sengelov H, Norgaard M, Andersen MK, Dufva IH, et al. Epidemiology and clinical significance of secondary and therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia: a National population-based cohort study. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:3641–9. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2014.60.0890 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Hulegårdh E, Nilsson C, Lazarevic V, Garelius H, Antunovic P, Rangert Derolf Å, et al. Characterization and prognostic features of secondary acute myeloid leukemia in a population-based setting: a report from the Swedish Acute Leukemia Registry. Am J Hematol. 2015;90:208–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajh.23908 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Della Porta MG. Prognosis of secondary acute myeloid leukemia. Leuk Res. 2013;37:857–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leukres.2013.04.016 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Park SH, Chi H-S, Cho Y-U, Jang S, Park C-J. Evaluation of prognostic factors in patients with therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia. Blood Res. 2013;48:185 https://doi.org/10.5045/br.2013.48.3.185 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Christiansen DH, Andersen MK, Pedersen-Bjergaard J. Mutations with loss of heterozygosity of p53 are common in therapy-related myelodysplasia and acute myeloid leukemia after exposure to alkylating agents and significantly associated with deletion or loss of 5q, a complex karyotype, and a poor prognosis. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:1405–13. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2001.19.5.1405 . - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
