No difference in clinical outcome, pain, and range of motion between fixed and mobile bearing Attune total knee arthroplasty: a prospective single-center trial
- PMID: 35501786
- PMCID: PMC9063062
- DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-05382-x
No difference in clinical outcome, pain, and range of motion between fixed and mobile bearing Attune total knee arthroplasty: a prospective single-center trial
Abstract
Background: Despite numerous scientific investigations, the tribological advantages of mobile bearing inserts have not been sustainably confirmed or refuted for modern knee prostheses in clinical studies. The purpose of this study was to compare fixed and mobile bearing inserts in order to draw conclusions regarding clinical benefits.
Methods: The present prospective single center cohort study of 2 non-randomized stratified groups consisted of 67 patients. All included patients received cemented total knee arthroplasty (Attune®) due to osteoarthritis. 34 patients were treated with a mobile and 33 patients with a fixed insert. The WOMAC score and the Visual Analogue Scale was used for the subjective assessment of success, while the Knee-Society-Score was used considering the Range of Motion for the objective assessment. The subjective and the clinical scores showed improvements for both compared groups postoperatively at 2 years of minimum follow-up.
Results: The overall postoperative results of the WOMAC score, the Knee-Society-Score and the Visual Analogue Scale presented no statistically difference between the compared groups (p > 0,05). The postoperative ROM showed a superior improvement of 13.2° ± 18.4° in the mobile-bearing group versus 4.9° ± 18.4° (p = 0.017) in the fixed-bearing group. The flexion of the knee joint was 114° ± 10.1° for the mobile-bearings and 109.2° ± 7.2° for fixed bearings (p = 0.012).
Conclusion: According to the findings, both inserts showed overall promising postoperative results, in terms of objective as well as subjective parameters, without clinically relevant significant differences, except for ROM, which was superior in the mobile bearing group. The present clinical trial has been registered at the ISRCTN registry with the reverence number ISRCTN15117998 on 04/04/2022.
Keywords: Fixed bearing; Mobile bearing; Total knee arthroplasty.
© 2022. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interests.
Similar articles
-
LCS mobile-bearing total knee replacement. A 10-year's follow-up study.Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2009 May;95(3):177-82. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2009.02.002. Epub 2009 Mar 27. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2009. PMID: 19328763
-
Mobile-bearing prosthesis did not improve mid-term clinical results of total knee arthroplasty.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010 Oct;18(10):1311-6. doi: 10.1007/s00167-010-1143-z. Epub 2010 Apr 21. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010. PMID: 20407753
-
Superior long-term survival for fixed bearing compared with mobile bearing in ligament-balanced total knee arthroplasty.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 May;26(5):1524-1531. doi: 10.1007/s00167-017-4542-6. Epub 2017 Apr 7. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018. PMID: 28389879
-
Superior Mid- to Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Mobile-Bearing Total Knee Arthroplasty Compared to Fixed-Bearing: A Meta-Analysis Based on a Minimum of 5 Years of Study.J Knee Surg. 2021 Oct;34(12):1368-1378. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1709490. Epub 2020 Jun 5. J Knee Surg. 2021. PMID: 32503063
-
Is There a Difference in the Outcome of Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty When Mobile-Bearing Versus Fixed-Bearing Implants Are Used?J Arthroplasty. 2025 Feb;40(2S1):S109-S112. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.10.084. Epub 2024 Oct 28. J Arthroplasty. 2025. PMID: 39490784 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Comparison of revision rates and epidemiological data of a single total knee arthroplasty system of different designs (cruciate retaining, posterior stabilized, mobile bearing, and fixed bearing): a meta-analysis and systematic review of clinical trials and national arthroplasty registries.Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 May;144(5):1997-2006. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05286-6. Epub 2024 Apr 3. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024. PMID: 38570357 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of the clinical efficacy of patellar lateral retraction and patellar eversion in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 Mar 20;26(1):279. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-08532-z. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025. PMID: 40108639 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of Using Mobile Bearing on the Incidence of Anterior Knee Pain in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Without Patellar Resurfacing: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.JB JS Open Access. 2025 May 29;10(2):e25.00007. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.25.00007. eCollection 2025 Apr-Jun. JB JS Open Access. 2025. PMID: 40443445 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical Benefit of Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty over Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty When Using Mobile-Bearing Implants.Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Jul 6;60(7):1103. doi: 10.3390/medicina60071103. Medicina (Kaunas). 2024. PMID: 39064532 Free PMC article.
-
No difference between mobile and fixed bearing in primary total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Sep;30(9):3138-3154. doi: 10.1007/s00167-022-07065-5. Epub 2022 Jul 21. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022. PMID: 35861866 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Callaghan JJ, Insall JN, Greenwald AS, Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Murray DW, et al. Mobile-bearing knee replacement: concepts and results. Instr Course Lect. 2001;50:431–449. - PubMed
-
- Ferguson KB, Bailey O, Anthony I, James PJ, Stother IG, M J G B. A prospective randomised study comparing rotating platform and fixed bearing total knee arthroplasty in a cruciate substituting design--outcomes at two year follow-up. Knee. 2014;21(1):151–155. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2013.09.007. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical