Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr 23:2022:9302403.
doi: 10.1155/2022/9302403. eCollection 2022.

Salvianolic Acid B Suppresses Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Metastasis through PKM2-Independent Metabolic Reprogramming

Affiliations

Salvianolic Acid B Suppresses Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Metastasis through PKM2-Independent Metabolic Reprogramming

Hong Zhang et al. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. .

Abstract

Objective: Salvianolic acid B (Sal B) has been demonstrated to be a potential chemoprevention agent for several cancers. Herein, we investigated the pharmacological function of Sal B on non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) metastasis.

Methods: Two NSCLC cell lines (NCI-H2030 and NCI-H1650) were disposed of by 200 μM Sal B or 10 μM PKM2 agonist TEPP-46. Wound healing and transwell experiments were implemented for analyzing migratory and invasive capacities. Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) markers β-catenin and E-cadherin were measured via western blotting. Cellular bioenergetics were evaluated with glucose uptake, lactate production, enolase activity, cellular ATP levels, as well as seahorse-based oxygen consumption rate (OCR), extracellular acidification rate (ECAR) analysis. Metabolic reprogramming markers PKM2, LDHA, and GLUT1 were detected via western blotting and immunofluorescence.

Results: The results showed that Sal B disposal weakened the migration and invasion of NCI-H2030 and NCI-H1650 cells and inactivated the EMT process according to downregulation of β-catenin and upregulation of E-cadherin. Sal B-treated NSCLC cells displayed decreased glucose uptake, lactate production, enolase activity, cellular ATP levels, OCR, and ECAR, indicating a reduction in metabolic reprogramming. Additionally, Sal B downregulated the expression of PKM2, LDHA, and GLUT1. TEPP-46 may reverse the inhibitory effect of Sal B on metastasis as well as metabolic reprogramming.

Conclusion: Our findings provide evidence that Sal B enables to weaken NSCLC metastasis through PKM2-independent metabolic reprogramming, which sheds light on the promising therapeutic usage of Sal B in treating NSCLC.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Sal B suppresses migration and invasion of NSCLC cells. (a, b) Cell viability of NCI-H2030 and NCI-H1650 cells that were exposed to a series of concentrations of Sal B lasting 24 or 48 hours through CCK-8. (c–e) Wound healing for assessing migration of 200 μM Sal B-treated NCI-H2030 and NCI-H1650 cells. Bar = 50 μM. (f–h) Evaluation of invasion of 200 μM Sal B-treated NCI-H2030 and NCI-H1650 cells through transwell. Bar = 50 μM. P < 0.05; ∗∗P < 0.01; ∗∗∗∗P < 0.0001.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Sal B weakens EMT process of NSCLC cells. (a–c) Western blotting of the expression of β-catenin and E-cadherin in 200 μM Sal B-treated NCI-H2030 cells. (d–f) Western blotting of the expression of β-catenin and E-cadherin in 200 μM Sal B-treated NCI-H1650 cells. ∗∗P < 0.01; ∗∗∗∗P < 0.0001.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Sal B weakens metabolic reprogramming of NSCLC cells. (a–d) Glucose uptake, lactate production, enolase activity, as well as cellular ATP production of 200 μM Sal B-treated NCI-H2030 and NCI-H1650 cells. (e, f) Measurement of OCR of 200 μM Sal B-treated two NSCLC cells when exposure to oligomycin, FCCP, and Rot/antiA. (g, h) Quantification of basal and maximal OCR of 200 μM Sal B-treated two NSCLC cells. (i, j) Measurement of ECAR of 200 μM Sal B-treated two NSCLC cells after exposing to glucose, oligomycin, and 2-DG. (k, l) Quantification of glycolysis ECAR of above two NSCLC cells. P < 0.05; ∗∗P < 0.01; ∗∗∗P < 0.001; ∗∗∗∗P < 0.0001.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Sal B inhibits PKM2-mediated metabolic reprogramming of NSCLC cells. (a–c) Western blots for PKM2 as well as p-PKM2 expressions in 200 μM Sal B-treated NCI-H2030 cells. (d–f) Western blots for PKM2 as well as p-PKM2 expressions in 200 μM Sal B-exposed NCI-H1650 cells. (g, h) Immunofluorescence for investigating PKM2 expression in 200 μM Sal B-exposed NCI-H2030 and NCI-H1650 cells. Bar = 10 μM. P < 0.05; ∗∗P < 0.01; ∗∗∗P < 0.001.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Sal B restrains metabolic reprogramming-relevant genes LDHA and GLUT1 in NSCLC cells. (a–f) Western blots for measuring LDHA and GLUT1 expressions in 200 μM Sal B-treated NCI-H2030 as well as NCI-H2030 cells. (g, h) Immunofluorescence for investigating the expression of LDHA and GLUT1 in 200 μM Sal B-exposed NCI-H2030 and NCI-H1650 cells. Bar = 10 μM. ∗∗P < 0.01; ∗∗∗P < 0.001.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Sal B suppresses migration and invasion of NSCLC cells via PKM2-independent metabolic reprogramming. (a–d) Wound healing of the migration of NCI-H2030 and NCI-H1650 cells when exposure to 200 μM Sal B or 10 μM TEPP-46. Bar = 50 μM. (e–g) Transwell for evaluating the invasion of NCI-H2030 and NCI-H1650 cells following exposure to 200 μM Sal B or 10 μM TEPP-46. Bar = 50 μM. Compared with control group, ∗∗P < 0.01; ∗∗∗P < 0.001; ∗∗∗∗P < 0.0001. Compared with Sal B group, #P < 0.05; ##P < 0.01; ###P < 0.001.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Sal B weakens EMT process of NSCLC cells through PKM2-independent metabolic reprogramming. (a–e) Western blotting for evaluating PKM2, GLUT1, β-catenin, and E-cadherin expressions in NCI-H2030 cells when exposure to 200 μM Sal B or 10 μM TEPP-46. (f–j) Western blotting of PKM2, GLUT1, β-catenin, and E-cadherin expressions in NCI-H1650 cells following exposure to 200 μM Sal B or 10 μM TEPP-46. Compared with control group, ∗∗P < 0.01; ∗∗∗P < 0.001; ∗∗∗∗P < 0.0001. Compared with Sal B group, ##P < 0.01; ###P < 0.001; ####P < 0.0001.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Singh T., Fatehi Hassanabad M., Fatehi Hassanabad A. Non-small cell lung cancer: emerging molecular targeted and immunotherapeutic agents. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. Reviews on Cancer . 2021;1876(2) doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2021.188636.188636 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zhu X., Chen L., Liu L., Niu X. EMT-mediated acquired EGFR-TKI resistance in NSCLC: mechanisms and strategies. Frontiers in Oncology . 2019;9:p. 1044. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.01044. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. VanderLaan P. A., Roy-Chowdhuri S. Current and future trends in non-small cell lung cancer biomarker testing: the American experience. Cancer Cytopathology . 2020;128(9):629–636. doi: 10.1002/cncy.22313. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Remark R., Becker C., Gomez J. E., et al. The non-small cell lung cancer immune contexture. A major determinant of tumor characteristics and patient outcome. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine . 2015;191(4):377–390. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201409-1671pp. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kim N., Kim H. K., Lee K., et al. Single-cell RNA sequencing demonstrates the molecular and cellular reprogramming of metastatic lung adenocarcinoma. Nature Communications . 2020;11(1):p. 2285. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-16164-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources