Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May 1;149(Suppl 5):e2021053509E.
doi: 10.1542/peds.2021-053509E.

Building a Life Course Intervention Research Framework

Affiliations

Building a Life Course Intervention Research Framework

Shirley A Russ et al. Pediatrics. .

Abstract

Objectives: To report on first steps toward building a Life Course Intervention Research Framework (LCIRF) to guide researchers studying interventions to improve lifelong health.

Methods: The Life Course Intervention Research Network, a collaborative national network of >75 researchers, service providers, community representatives and thought leaders, participated in an iterative review process. Building on the revised Medical Research Council Guidance for Developing and Evaluating Complex Interventions, they identified 12 additional key models with features for inclusion in the LCIRF, then incorporated the 12 characteristics identified by the Life Course Intervention Research Network as actionable features of Life Course Interventions to produce the new LCIRF.

Results: The LCIRF sets out a detailed step-wise approach to intervention development: (1) conceptualization and planning, (2) design, (3) implementation, (4) evaluation, and (5) spreading and scaling of interventions. Each step is infused with life course intervention characteristics including a focus on (1) collaborative codesign (2) health optimization, (3) supporting emerging health development capabilities (4) strategic timing, (5) multilevel approaches, and (6) health equity. Key features include a detailed transdisciplinary knowledge synthesis to inform intervention development; formation of strong partnerships with family, community, and youth representatives in intervention codesign; a means of testing the impact of each intervention on biobehavioral processes underlying emerging health trajectories; and close attention to intervention context.

Conclusions: This first iteration of the LCIRF has been largely expert driven. Next steps will involve widespread partner engagement in framework refinement and further development. Implementation will require changes to the way intervention studies are organized and funded.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICT OF INTEREST DISCLOSURES: The authors have indicated they have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
A, provides details on activities and other considerations for life course research at stage 1: conception and planning. B, provides details on activities and other considerations for life course research at stage 2: design. C, provides details on activities and other considerations for life course research at stages 3–5: implementation, evaluation, and translation. While much of the stage content represented in this figure applies to all intervention research, not just life course intervention research, the detailed steps are included here for clarity with the specific life course content relevant to each stage being depicted in Table 3.
FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
A, provides details on activities and other considerations for life course research at stage 1: conception and planning. B, provides details on activities and other considerations for life course research at stage 2: design. C, provides details on activities and other considerations for life course research at stages 3–5: implementation, evaluation, and translation. While much of the stage content represented in this figure applies to all intervention research, not just life course intervention research, the detailed steps are included here for clarity with the specific life course content relevant to each stage being depicted in Table 3.
FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
A, provides details on activities and other considerations for life course research at stage 1: conception and planning. B, provides details on activities and other considerations for life course research at stage 2: design. C, provides details on activities and other considerations for life course research at stages 3–5: implementation, evaluation, and translation. While much of the stage content represented in this figure applies to all intervention research, not just life course intervention research, the detailed steps are included here for clarity with the specific life course content relevant to each stage being depicted in Table 3.

References

    1. Halfon N, Hochstein M. Life course health development: an integrated framework for developing health, policy, and research. Milbank Q. 2002;80(3):433–479, iii - PMC - PubMed
    1. Halfon N, Larson K, Lu M, Tullis E, Russ S. Lifecourse health development: past, present and future. Matern Child Health J. 2014;18(2):344–365 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Halfon N, Forrest CB. The Emerging theoretical framework of life course health development. In: Halfon N, Forrest CB, Lerner RM, Faustman EM, eds.. Handbook of Life Course Health Development. Cham, CH: Springer; 2017:19–43
    1. Di Cesare M, Sorić M, Bovet P, et al. The epidemiological burden of obesity in childhood: a worldwide epidemic requiring urgent action. BMC Med. 2019;17(1):212. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anderson PM, Butcher KF, Schanzenbach DW. Understanding recent trends in childhood obesity in the United States. Econ Hum Biol. 2019;34:16–25 - PubMed

Publication types