Insulin allergy: a diagnostic and therapeutic strategy based on a retrospective cohort and a case-control study
- PMID: 35505238
- DOI: 10.1007/s00125-022-05710-9
Insulin allergy: a diagnostic and therapeutic strategy based on a retrospective cohort and a case-control study
Abstract
Aims/hypothesis: Insulin allergy is a rare but significant clinical challenge. We aimed to develop a management workflow by (1) validating clinical criteria to guide diagnosis, based on a retrospective cohort, and (2) assessing the diagnostic performance of confirmatory tests, based on a case-control study.
Methods: In the retrospective cohort, patients with suspected insulin allergy were classified into three likelihood categories according to the presence of all (likely insulin allergy; 26/52, 50%), some (possible insulin allergy; 9/52, 17%) or none (unlikely insulin allergy; 17/52, 33%) of four clinical criteria: (1) recurrent local or systemic immediate or delayed hypersensitivity reactions; (2) reactions elicited by each injection; (3) reactions centred on the injection sites; and (4) reactions observed by the investigator (i.e. in response to an insulin challenge test). All underwent intradermal reaction (IDR) tests. A subsequent case-control study assessed the diagnostic performance of IDR, skin prick and serum anti-insulin IgE tests in ten clinically diagnosed insulin allergy patients, 24 insulin-treated non-allergic patients and 21 insulin-naive patients.
Results: In the retrospective cohort, an IDR test validated the clinical diagnosis in 24/26 (92%), 3/9 (33%) and 0/14 (0%) likely, possible and unlikely insulin allergy patients, respectively. In the case-control study, an IDR test was 80% sensitive and 100% specific and identified the index insulin(s). The skin prick and IgE tests had a marginal diagnostic value. Patients with IDR-confirmed insulin allergy were treated using a stepwise strategy.
Conclusions/interpretation: Subject to validation, clinical likelihood criteria can effectively guide diabetologists towards an insulin allergy diagnosis before undertaking allergology tests. An IDR test shows the best diagnostic performance. A progressive management strategy can subsequently be implemented. Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion is ultimately required in most patients.
Clinicaltrials: gov: NCT01407640.
Keywords: Anaphylaxis; IgE; Immune tolerance; Intradermal reaction; Prick test; Skin test.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- Lindholm A, Jensen LB, Home PD, Raskin P, Boehm BO, Rastam J (2002) Immune responses to insulin aspart and biphasic insulin aspart in people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 25(5):876–882. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.25.5.876 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Fineberg SE, Huang J, Brunelle R, Gulliya KS, Anderson JH Jr (2003) Effect of long-term exposure to insulin lispro on the induction of antibody response in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 26(1):89–96. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.26.1.89 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Radermecker RP, Scheen AJ (2007) Allergy reactions to insulin: effects of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion and insulin analogues. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 23(5):348–355. https://doi.org/10.1002/dmrr.714 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Ghazavi MK, Johnston GA (2011) Insulin allergy. Clin Dermatol 29(3):300–305 - DOI
-
- Fineberg SE, Kawabata TT, Finco-Kent D, Fountaine RJ, Finch GL, Krasner AS (2007) Immunological responses to exogenous insulin. Endocr Rev 28(6):625–652. https://doi.org/10.1210/er.2007-0002 - DOI - PubMed