Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation

Safety and efficacy of a feed additive consisting of acacia gum (gum Arabic) for all animal species (A.I.P.G. Association for International Promotion of Gums)

EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) et al. EFSA J. .

Abstract

Following a request from the European Commission, EFSA was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of acacia gum (gum Arabic) as a feed additive for all animal species. Acacia gum is safe up to approximately 280 mg/kg complete feed for chickens for fattening, 375 mg/kg complete feed for turkeys for fattening, 400 mg/kg complete feed for rabbit, 500 and 600 mg/kg complete feed for piglets and pigs for fattening, respectively, 1,100 mg/kg complete feed for cattle for fattening and 1,250 mg/kg complete feed for veal calves and salmonids. No conclusions can be reached on the safety for long living and reproductive animal, until the genotoxic potential of the additive is fully assessed in the framework of its use as a feed additive. No exposure of the consumer to the additive or its metabolites is expected. Therefore, the use of the additive in animal nutrition is considered safe for the consumers. Acacia gum is a potential dermal and respiratory sensitiser. No conclusion can be reached on the irritating potential to the skin or eyes. The use of acacia gum in animal nutrition is considered safe for the environment. The FEEDAP Panel is not in the position to conclude on the efficacy of acacia gum.

Keywords: acacia gum; efficacy; emulsifiers; gelling agents; gum Arabic; safety; stabilisers; technological additive; thickeners.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Den Besten G, van Eunen K, Groen A, Venema K, Reijngoud DJ and Bakker M, 2013. The role of short‐chain fatty acids in the interplay between diet, gut microbiota, and host energy metabolism. The Journal of Lipid Research, 54, 2325–2340. - PMC - PubMed
    1. EFSA ANS Panel (EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added toFood) , Mortensen A, Aguilar F, Crebelli R, Di Domenico A, Frutos MJ, Galtier P, Gott D, Gundert‐Remy U, Lambre C, Leblanc J‐C, Lindtner O, Moldeus P, Mosesso P, Oskarsson A, Parent‐Massin D, Stankovic I, Waalkens‐Berendsen I, Woutersen RA, Wright M, Younes M, Brimer L, Christodoulidou A, Lodi F, Tard A and Dusemund B, 2017. Scientific Opinion on the re‐evaluation of acacia gum (E 414) as a food additive. EFSA Journal 2017;15(4):4741, 51 pp. 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4741 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. EFSA FAF Panel (EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings) , Younes M, Aquilina G, Castle L, Engel K‐H, Fowler P, Frutos Fernandez MJ, Fürst P, Gürtler R, Husøy T, Mennes W, Moldeus P, Oskarsson A, Shah R, Waalkens‐Berendsen I, Wölfle D, Dusemund B, Mortensen A, Turck D, Barmaz S, Smeraldi C, Tard A and Gundert‐Remy U, 2019. Scientific Opinion on the re‐evaluation ofacacia gum (E 414) as a food additive in foods for infants below 16 weeks of age and the follow‐up of itsre‐evaluation as a food additive for uses in foods for all population groups. EFSA Journal 2019;17(12):5922, 23 pp. 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5922 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. EFSA FEEDAP Panel (EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed) , 2012a. Guidance for the preparation of dossiers for technological additives. EFSA Journal 2012;10(1):2528, 23 pp. 10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2528 - DOI
    1. EFSA FEEDAP Panel (EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed) , 2012b. Guidance on studies concerning the safety of use of the additive for users/workers. EFSA Journal 2012;10(1):2539, 5 pp. 10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2539 - DOI